
dw.com
German Military Study Reveals Low but Concerning Levels of Extremist Attitudes
A German military study found that 0.4% of soldiers hold right-wing extremist views, far less than the general population, but concerning levels of chauvinism (6.4%) and xenophobia (3.5%) were also discovered, prompting concerns about future recruitment efforts.
- What other problematic attitudes were identified in the study, and how do these findings compare to the general German population?
- The study, while showing a lower-than-expected prevalence of right-wing extremism within the Bundeswehr (0.4% of soldiers), also uncovered concerning levels of chauvinism (6.4%) and xenophobia (3.5%). This suggests the need for a broader approach to addressing problematic attitudes within the military, beyond just right-wing extremism.
- What is the prevalence of right-wing extremist attitudes within the German military, and what are the broader implications of this finding for national security?
- A recent Bundeswehr study reveals that only 0.4% of soldiers exhibit right-wing extremist attitudes, significantly lower than the 5.4% in the general German population. However, 6.4% showed chauvinistic and 3.5% xenophobic attitudes, highlighting other areas of concern within the military.
- Given the study's limitations, what further steps are necessary to ensure the Bundeswehr effectively addresses extremist and problematic attitudes within its ranks, and how might increased recruitment efforts impact these efforts?
- The findings, while seemingly positive, warrant caution. Increased recruitment efforts planned by the German government could make thorough vetting more difficult, potentially increasing the risk of extremist infiltration. The study's reliance on self-reporting also raises questions about the accuracy of the data, as some respondents might downplay their views.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introduction emphasize the low percentage of soldiers with right-wing extremist attitudes, presenting the study's findings as largely positive news. This framing downplays the concerns raised by researchers and experts about the potential for underreporting and the continued existence of problematic views within the Bundeswehr. The article's focus on the relatively low number, compared to the general population, might overshadow the substantial number of soldiers holding chauvinistic or xenophobic views.
Language Bias
The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, using factual language to present the study's findings. However, phrases such as "positive news" and "relief" in relation to the low percentage of extremist soldiers, subtly skew the overall perception. The use of the term "shadow army" quoted from other media outlets, without further analysis, may inject unnecessary sensationalism.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on right-wing extremism within the Bundeswehr, but gives less attention to other forms of extremism, such as left-wing or Islamist extremism. While the study mentions these, the focus and detail are significantly less. This omission might lead readers to believe right-wing extremism is the primary concern, neglecting the potential impact of other ideologies. The article also omits discussion of potential systemic issues within the Bundeswehr that might contribute to the prevalence of extremist views. For instance, the article briefly mentions a lack of awareness regarding the complexities of modern right-wing mindsets but does not delve into the specifics of such issues.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by focusing on the low percentage of soldiers with right-wing extremist views while simultaneously highlighting other problematic attitudes (chauvinism, xenophobia). While these are distinct issues, the framing might lead readers to perceive them as separate and less significant than the main focus on right-wing extremism, rather than acknowledging the interconnectedness of these viewpoints within broader societal trends.
Sustainable Development Goals
The study reveals that the percentage of soldiers with right-wing extremist attitudes is lower than in the general population. This suggests progress in efforts to maintain the integrity and democratic values within the Bundeswehr, contributing to stronger institutions and peace. However, the presence of chauvinist and xenophobic attitudes, as well as ongoing investigations into extremism, indicates a need for continued vigilance and efforts to combat these issues. The quote "The study reveals that only 0.4% of soldiers show right-wing-extremist attitudes. Among the military's civilian personnel, the proportion is 0.8%, much less than the 5.4% measured in the general German population" highlights the positive aspect of the study, showing a lower rate in the military than in the general population. The ongoing investigations and concerns about potential underreporting show the ongoing need for work in this area.