German Military Study Reveals Low but Persistent Extremism

German Military Study Reveals Low but Persistent Extremism

dw.com

German Military Study Reveals Low but Persistent Extremism

A German military study found that 0.4% of soldiers hold consistently right-wing extremist views, significantly less than the general population (5.4%), but concerning levels of chovinism (6.4%) and xenophobia (3.5%) remain.

Spanish
Germany
PoliticsGermany MilitaryExtremismRight-Wing ExtremismBundeswehrGerman Army
BundeswehrZmsbw (Center For Military History And Social Sciences)Mad (Military Intelligence Service)Ksk (Elite Unit)
Franco A.Annegret Kramp-KarrenbauerMarkus SteinbrecherAnke Hoffstadt
What broader societal factors might contribute to the presence of chovinistic and xenophobic attitudes within the Bundeswehr?
The study's findings, while revealing lower-than-expected rates of extremism, highlight persistent issues of nationalism and intolerance within the Bundeswehr. These attitudes, even if not explicitly extremist, still pose a threat to democratic values and military cohesion. The study involved over 4,300 interviews and 18 focus groups.
What is the prevalence of right-wing extremism within the German military, and what are the immediate implications of these findings?
A recent study by the German military (Bundeswehr) found that less than 1% of its soldiers hold consistently right-wing extremist views (0.4%). This is significantly lower than the 5.4% found in the general German population. However, the study also revealed concerning levels of chovinism (6.4%) and xenophobia (3.5%) among soldiers.
How might the Bundeswehr address the persistent challenges of nationalism and intolerance within its ranks, while also considering the potential limitations of self-reporting studies?
Despite the relatively low percentage of extremist views, the persistence of chovinistic and xenophobic attitudes within the Bundeswehr warrants continued monitoring and reform. The study's methodology, while rigorous, raises questions about potential underreporting due to its voluntary nature and the timing of the surveys, which followed increased scrutiny of right-wing extremism in the military. Future studies should explore methods to increase participation and address potential biases.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the study's findings positively, highlighting the low percentage of soldiers with extremist views and comparing it favorably to the general population. The headline (if there was one) likely emphasized this positive aspect. The inclusion of past scandals serves to contextualize the study, but also contributes to the framing by suggesting that despite past issues, the situation is improving.

2/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral, employing descriptive statistics and quotes from researchers. However, phrases like "positive vision" and "certain relief" in describing the study's findings subtly convey a positive spin. The use of "problemmatic postures" instead of a more direct term like "problematic attitudes" slightly softens the impact.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The study focuses on self-reported data, acknowledging limitations but not fully exploring potential biases arising from voluntary participation and the timing of the survey immediately following increased scrutiny of right-wing extremism within the Bundeswehr. The analysis omits discussion of potential systemic issues within the Bundeswehr that might contribute to the prevalence of extremist views, focusing primarily on individual attitudes. Further, while mentioning the loss of ammunition and the KSK scandal, it lacks deeper exploration of these events' impact on fostering or revealing extremist tendencies.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article doesn't present a false dichotomy, but it does emphasize the relatively low percentage of soldiers with extremist views while acknowledging a significant percentage with "consistently chauvinistic" or "consistently xenophobic" attitudes. This framing might subtly downplay the severity of these non-extremist but problematic attitudes.

Sustainable Development Goals

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions Positive
Direct Relevance

The study reveals efforts to address right-wing extremism within the German armed forces, contributing to stronger institutions and improved justice. The findings, while acknowledging limitations, show a lower prevalence of extremism than in the general population, indicating progress in identifying and potentially mitigating such threats. Further investigation and reforms are implied to continue this positive trend.