dw.com
German Peace Report Warns of Worsening Global Security
A German peace research report, "Friedensgutachten 2025," expresses deep concern over global conflicts, particularly citing the war in Ukraine and the situation in Gaza, and criticizing the US under Trump's presidency for undermining liberal institutions; it recommends strengthening European defense and ending arms exports to Israel.
- How does the report assess the impact of political changes in the US on international relations and the effectiveness of NATO?
- The report sharply criticizes the US under President Trump, alleging a shift towards authoritarianism and the undermining of liberal institutions. Concerns are also raised about the erosion of international law and the weakening of NATO's effectiveness.
- What are the key findings of the "Friedensgutachten 2025" report regarding the current global security situation and its outlook?
- A new annual report, "Friedensgutachten 2025," by leading German peace and conflict researchers paints a grim picture of the global security landscape. The report cites the war in Ukraine, conflicts in Gaza and Sudan, and over 122 million refugees as evidence of a sharply worsening situation.
- What policy recommendations does the report offer to the German government concerning its approach to international conflicts and security cooperation?
- The researchers recommend strengthening European defense capabilities independently of NATO, highlighting the EU's current focus on national rather than collective defense. They also call for an end to German arms exports to Israel and for the recognition of a Palestinian state.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The report's framing heavily emphasizes the pessimistic outlook of leading German conflict researchers. The headline itself, implying a bleak future, sets a negative tone. The repeated use of strong negative words like "pessimistic," "ruining," and "threatening" throughout the text reinforces this negative framing. The report's structure prioritizes criticisms of US politics under Trump and the perceived failures of NATO, potentially overshadowing other significant global conflicts and challenges.
Language Bias
The report uses strong, negative language to describe the actions of various actors. For example, describing Trump's actions as "ruining liberal institutions" is a loaded statement. Similarly, referring to the situation as having "a bleak future" is a subjective judgment presented as fact. More neutral alternatives would be to describe specific actions and their consequences without subjective judgment. Terms like "criticized," "weakened," or "challenged" could replace more charged words.
Bias by Omission
The report focuses heavily on the negative assessments of the situation, potentially omitting positive developments or alternative perspectives on the issues discussed. There is no mention of any positive actions taken by any nation or organization. The analysis almost exclusively highlights the negative impacts of specific political figures and events, potentially leading to a skewed perception of overall global stability. There is also a notable absence of discussion regarding potential long-term solutions beyond strengthening European defense and calling for an end to arms sales to Israel. This omission may limit the reader's ability to form a fully informed opinion on the overall complexity of these situations.
False Dichotomy
The report presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between a decaying NATO and a yet-to-be-formed effective European defense system. The reality is likely far more nuanced, with possibilities for reforming NATO or other forms of international cooperation not fully explored. The framing of the US under Trump as purely authoritarian also ignores the complexities of US politics and the diversity of opinions within the country.
Gender Bias
The report does not exhibit overt gender bias in its language or representation. The few named individuals are evenly split between genders. However, a more in-depth analysis of the report's sources and perspectives might reveal if gendered assumptions are implicitly present.
Sustainable Development Goals
The report highlights a pessimistic outlook on global peace and security, citing the wars in Ukraine, Gaza, and Sudan, as well as the rise of authoritarianism and the weakening of international institutions. These factors directly undermine the targets of SDG 16, which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies, provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels. The erosion of international law, the disregard for civilian protection in conflicts, and the challenges to the NATO alliance further exemplify this negative impact.