dw.com
Germany to Return Kogi Ritual Items to Colombia
The Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation will return three Kogi ritual objects (staff, basket, woven item) to Colombia, following a 2023 return of two masks; all items were acquired in 1915 by Konrad Theodor Preuss, the curator of the Ethnological Museum's forerunner.
- What are the key implications of returning these sacred Kogi artifacts to Colombia?
- The Prussian Cultural Institute (SPK) will return three Kogi ritual objects—a staff, basket, and woven item—currently held at Colombia's ICANH. These items, used in ongoing sacred ceremonies, were acquired in 1915 under unclear circumstances. Restitution follows a similar 2023 return of two Kogi masks.
- How does this restitution reflect broader trends in Germany and internationally regarding the repatriation of cultural artifacts?
- This restitution builds on Germany's growing engagement with Indigenous rights and repatriation of cultural artifacts. It follows the 2022 return of Benin Bronzes and reflects a broader trend of museums reconsidering colonial-era acquisitions. The Kogi's active use of these objects in spiritual practices underscores their significance, accelerating the restitution process.
- What precedents does this case set for future repatriation efforts involving legally acquired but culturally significant objects?
- This case may influence future restitution debates, particularly concerning legally acquired but culturally significant items. The emphasis on collaboration and understanding of Indigenous perspectives sets a precedent for institutions globally. Future decisions will likely hinge on the interplay between legal acquisition, ongoing cultural significance, and the evolving ethical considerations in repatriation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is largely neutral, focusing on the collaborative process and the importance of cultural repatriation. However, the emphasis on the museum's proactive role in restitution and the positive quotes from the museum director might subtly tilt the narrative towards a more favorable portrayal of the institution's actions. The headline, while factual, could be improved by focusing less on the German museum and more on the repatriation itself, thereby reducing potential bias towards one side.
Language Bias
The language is generally neutral, although certain phrases like "brutal punitive expedition" (when describing the acquisition of Benin Bronzes) might be considered loaded, and the use of the phrase "supposedly purchased" when discussing the Kogi objects can be seen as subtly loaded. More neutral alternatives could be "acquired" or "obtained" in both instances. Overall, the tone is objective and informative.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including more diverse perspectives beyond the museum director and Kogi representatives. While the Colombian government's position is mentioned, a more in-depth exploration of other stakeholders' views (e.g., legal scholars specializing in repatriation, other indigenous groups with similar restitution efforts) would provide a more comprehensive picture. The article also omits discussion of potential challenges or criticisms of the restitution process, which might create a more balanced presentation.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the positive impact of returning cultural artifacts to their rightful owners, fostering reconciliation and strengthening relationships between indigenous communities and institutions. This aligns with SDG 16, which promotes peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, providing access to justice for all and building effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.