lemonde.fr
Germany's Antisemitism Resolution Sparks Debate
The German Bundestag passed a resolution against antisemitism, sparking debate over the definition of antisemitism and its potential impact on free speech.
French
France
PoliticsHuman Rights ViolationsGermany IsraelAntisemitismFree SpeechDebateResolution
BundestagSpdCdu-CsuFdpInternational Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (Ihra)
Liesa JohannsenBarbara Stollberg-Rilinger
- What action did the German Bundestag take on November 7th, 2024?
- The German Bundestag passed a resolution against antisemitism on November 7th, 2024, following over a year of debate. The resolution, initially intended as a supportive message, became entangled in discussions about defining antisemitism and implementing repressive measures.
- What are the main criticisms of the IHRA definition of antisemitism?
- Concerns exist that the IHRA definition conflates criticism of Israel with antisemitism, creating a chilling effect on legitimate discourse. Academics, cultural figures, and associations worry about the potential for abuse and the blurring of lines between criticism and prejudice.
- What is the main controversy surrounding the Bundestag's resolution on antisemitism?
- The Bundestag's resolution, while aiming to combat antisemitism, has sparked controversy due to its adoption of the potentially problematic IHRA definition and the concerns it raises regarding free speech and the suppression of criticism of Israel.
- What alternative approach to defining antisemitism was suggested by legal scholars and researchers?
- A group of legal scholars and researchers proposed using the IHRA definition as a guideline, rather than a strict rule, and suggested funding research on the Holocaust and the Middle East instead of relying on a government-defined definition of antisemitism.
- What definition of antisemitism is used in the resolution, and what are the concerns surrounding it?
- The resolution utilizes the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, which has drawn criticism for potentially hindering free speech regarding Israel. Critics argue the definition is vague and could be misused to silence political opponents.