taz.de
Germany's NIS2 Implementation Faces Criticism
Experts criticize Germany's draft law for implementing the EU's NIS2 directive due to its weaknesses, exemptions for government agencies, and fragmented legislation, highlighting the need for a holistic approach to cybersecurity and digital resilience.
German
Germany
Germany EuCybersecurityLegislationIt
BitkomBsiHisolutionsInterfaceUniversity Of Bremen
Dennis-Kenji KipkerTimo KobFelix KuhlenkampSven Herpig
- What is the central point of criticism regarding the exemptions in the draft law?
- A central criticism is the extensive exemptions for government agencies, creating a double standard where companies face strict requirements while the state enjoys reduced ones.
- What are the main criticisms of Germany's draft law implementing the EU's NIS2 directive?
- The German government is criticized for its draft law implementing the EU's NIS2 directive, which experts deem weak and unclear, hindering improvements in cybersecurity.
- How is Germany's current cybersecurity legislation described, and why is that problematic?
- The current cybersecurity legislation in Germany is fragmented and inconsistent, which experts argue is neither efficient nor effective in enhancing cybersecurity.
- What are the financial implications of cyberattacks in Germany, and what is the trend in affected businesses?
- The rising costs of cyberattacks, estimated at €266.6 billion in the last year in Germany, and the growing number of affected businesses highlight the urgency of improved cybersecurity measures.
- What is the proposed holistic approach to address cybersecurity in Germany, and what additional measures are suggested?
- Experts recommend a holistic approach focusing on digital resilience, encompassing not just cybersecurity but also the ability of institutions to withstand attacks and disruptions, alongside expanding training for IT security professionals.