dw.com
Global Authoritarianism: Erosion of Democracy
The rise of global authoritarianism, exemplified by Jair Bolsonaro's attempted coup in Brazil and Donald Trump's actions in the US, is eroding democratic structures; Germany's AfD party gained 20.8% of the vote in February 2025 elections, highlighting the spread of this trend.
- How do the actions of leaders like Bolsonaro and Trump exemplify a broader pattern of authoritarianism, and what are the underlying causes?
- This global trend connects authoritarian leaders who employ similar strategies: undermining democratic institutions, suppressing dissent, and exploiting social and economic inequalities to gain power. Their actions are fueled by a convergence of factors, including the post-2008 economic crisis and rising social unrest.
- What are the long-term consequences of the current global trend towards authoritarianism, and what strategies can effectively counter this threat?
- The future impact of this global trend includes further erosion of democratic norms, increased political instability, and potential for more violent conflicts. The success of far-right parties like Germany's AfD, which gained 20.8% of the vote in the February 2025 elections, demonstrates the urgency of addressing the underlying issues of economic inequality and social division.
- What are the immediate global implications of the rise of authoritarian leaders employing similar strategies to undermine democratic institutions and exploit social inequalities?
- The rise of authoritarianism globally is eroding democratic structures, as evidenced by Jair Bolsonaro's attempted coup in Brazil and Donald Trump's actions in the US. Both leaders systematically weakened institutions, attacked political opponents, and spread disinformation, mirroring similar trends in Hungary, Venezuela, and Turkey.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the rise of right-wing populism as a dangerous global threat to democracy. The narrative structure emphasizes examples of authoritarian tendencies and actions by specific leaders, reinforcing this negative framing. The headline (if any) and opening paragraphs would likely reinforce this perspective, setting the tone for a critical analysis of the described events. While this framing is valid, it could benefit from more balanced reporting, acknowledging the broader spectrum of opinions and political realities within the countries discussed.
Language Bias
The article uses strong and critical language, describing Bolsonaro's actions as a "desajeitada tentativa de golpe de Estado" and characterizing Putin as a "ditador imperialista e criminoso de guerra." Such language is loaded and lacks neutrality. While evocative, terms like "ultradireitista," "extrema direita," and "xenófoba" carry negative connotations and could be replaced with more neutral alternatives like "far-right," "right-wing populist," or "nationalist" to achieve greater objectivity. The repeated use of terms like "autoritário" strengthens the negative framing.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the rise of right-wing authoritarianism in various countries, particularly Germany and Brazil. While it mentions the global context, it could benefit from a more in-depth exploration of other nations experiencing similar trends. The omission of specific examples beyond the mentioned countries might limit the reader's understanding of the global scope of the issue. Additionally, alternative perspectives on the causes and potential solutions to the rise of right-wing populism could be included for a more balanced view. However, given the article's length and focus, these omissions might be acceptable.
False Dichotomy
The article doesn't explicitly present false dichotomies, but it implicitly frames the situation as a struggle between democracy and authoritarianism, potentially overlooking the nuances and complexities within each system. For example, the economic policies of some right-wing parties are presented as uniformly detrimental to the poor, ignoring potential complexities or exceptions. This simplification risks overgeneralizing and neglecting diverse viewpoints within the right-wing movement.
Gender Bias
The article mentions Alice Weidel, leader of the AfD, and includes details about her family life which are seemingly included to highlight an ironic contrast with the party's stance on family values. While this is relevant to the discussion, it could be viewed as focusing on personal details to criticize her more than equivalent details would be included for male politicians discussed. The article could benefit from a more in-depth discussion on the role of gender in right-wing movements. The analysis lacks exploration of how gender dynamics play into the rise of populism and extremism.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article details the rise of authoritarianism globally, exemplified by figures like Bolsonaro, Trump, and Orbán. These leaders undermine democratic institutions, spread misinformation, and utilize the justice system for political purposes. The erosion of democratic norms and the threat to the rule of law directly impact SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions). The rise of the AfD in Germany, with its extremist rhetoric and connections to illegal activities, further exemplifies this negative impact.