dw.com
Global Cartoon Exhibition Exposes Social Media's Dark Side
A global exhibition of cartoons, running from February 4 to April 15, 2025, in Dortmund, Germany, and online, reveals the pervasive influence of social media and its dangers, including misinformation, manipulation, and addiction, as depicted by artists from Vietnam, Costa Rica, Germany, the Netherlands, Turkey, Australia, Philippines, Cuba, Brazil, and Argentina.
- What specific concerns regarding addiction, privacy, and the manipulation of opinions are raised by the cartoonists' work?
- The exhibition uses cartoons to depict how social media's addictive nature, coupled with the spread of misinformation, poses significant threats. Specific examples include cyberbullying, the deluge of emails, and the manipulation of opinions through influencers, demonstrating the widespread impact.
- What are the future implications of AI's role in creating and spreading misinformation online, as suggested by the exhibition?
- The increasing sophistication of AI further complicates the issue of discerning truth from falsehood online, potentially exacerbating existing problems. This exhibition serves as a cautionary tale, urging users to be more critical and aware of the dangers inherent in our increasingly digital world.
- How does this cartoon exhibition highlight the global impact of social media's influence on the spread of misinformation and manipulation?
- A global virtual exhibition of cartoons reveals how social media impacts lives worldwide, highlighting concerns about misinformation, manipulation, and addiction. Cartoonists from diverse backgrounds illustrate the pervasive influence of tech companies and the challenges of distinguishing fact from fiction online.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article is framed around the dangers and negative impacts of social media. The headline, "When a lie becomes a fact," immediately sets a negative tone. The repeated use of imagery and language associated with entrapment, manipulation, and drowning reinforces this negative framing. Positive aspects, even those briefly mentioned, are downplayed to emphasize the dangers.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language to portray social media negatively. Terms like "addicted to clickbait," "trawled by billionaires," "deluge of messages," and "evil wolf" evoke strong negative emotions and contribute to a biased presentation. More neutral alternatives could include 'heavy use of social media', 'influence of large corporations', 'high volume of emails', and 'powerful corporations'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the negative aspects of social media, neglecting potential benefits or positive uses. While it mentions the usefulness of smartphones, this is quickly overshadowed by the negative portrayals. The complexities of social media's impact are simplified, omitting nuanced discussions of its role in social movements, community building, or access to information in underserved areas. This omission leads to a biased presentation.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the relationship between users and social media platforms as purely exploitative, ignoring the agency users have in choosing how to interact with these platforms. The 'fish being trawled by billionaires' metaphor oversimplifies a complex relationship and ignores the many ways individuals utilize social media for their own purposes.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the spread of misinformation and manipulation on social media, which negatively impacts the ability to access reliable information and critical thinking skills, crucial for quality education. The cartoons depicting the difficulty in discerning facts from falsehoods directly relate to the challenge of developing informed and discerning citizens, a key aspect of quality education.