pt.euronews.com
Global Cloud Vulnerabilities Double, Exposing Bosnia, Serbia, and Albania
A new study reveals that global cloud vulnerabilities more than doubled between 2019 and 2023, reaching 3900, with Bosnia, Serbia, and Albania identified as the most vulnerable European nations due to high numbers of cloud security breaches; the UK and Italy also have high numbers of breaches but higher cybersecurity preparedness.
- What are the most significant findings regarding global cloud security vulnerabilities and the countries most at risk?
- Global cloud vulnerabilities more than doubled from 1700 to 3900 between 2019 and 2023, according to IBM's X-Force research. This surge highlights a critical weakness in global cybersecurity. Bosnia, Serbia, and Albania are identified as the most vulnerable European countries.
- What factors contribute to the varying levels of cybersecurity preparedness among the most vulnerable European countries?
- Kloudle's research reveals that Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Albania are the most vulnerable European nations to cloud security breaches, scoring 71%, 69%, and 67%, respectively. Bosnia, despite its small size, suffered nearly nine million cloud security breaches in two decades. The UK and Italy also face significant risks, with over one billion and nearly 800 million estimated breaches, respectively.
- What are the long-term implications of these cloud security vulnerabilities, and what steps can be taken to mitigate future risks?
- The significant disparity in cybersecurity preparedness between countries like Bosnia (low) and Italy (high) underscores the urgent need for targeted improvements in infrastructure and education. Future investments must focus on bolstering defenses in vulnerable regions while promoting broader adoption of advanced encryption technologies and robust data protection measures.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introduction emphasize the risks in the Balkans, potentially creating an alarmist tone and directing attention away from other vulnerable regions. The article's structure prioritizes the alarming statistics over the mitigating efforts or solutions being undertaken, shaping reader perception towards a pessimistic outlook. The focus on high-risk countries is disproportionate to their global impact.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, although terms like "vulnerable" and "high risk" could be considered somewhat loaded. The use of statistics adds to the gravity, but doesn't necessarily skew the information. The article could benefit from using more precise phrasing to avoid potentially subjective terms.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on specific European countries' vulnerabilities, but omits a broader global perspective on cloud security threats. While it mentions a global increase in vulnerabilities, it doesn't provide data or analysis for regions beyond Europe, potentially misrepresenting the overall picture. The lack of context on global cybersecurity investment and initiatives also limits the analysis.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a dichotomy between countries with high vulnerability scores (like Bosnia, Serbia, and Albania) and those with high preparedness scores (like Italy and the UK). This oversimplifies the complex issue, ignoring factors like the nature of threats, the types of cloud services used, and other variables affecting security.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a significant cybersecurity risk disparity between developed nations (like the UK and Italy) and developing nations in the Balkans (Bosnia, Serbia, Albania). Developed nations experience a higher volume of breaches but possess better preparedness, while developing nations face both higher vulnerability and lower preparedness, exacerbating existing inequalities in access to secure digital infrastructure and resources. This digital divide hinders equitable access to information and opportunities, thus negatively impacting progress towards SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities).