fr.euronews.com
Global Cloud Vulnerabilities Double, Exposing Critical Risks
Global cloud vulnerabilities have more than doubled to 3900 in four years, with Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Albania identified as the most vulnerable European nations due to high breach numbers, while the UK and Italy also face significant risks despite higher preparedness levels.
- What are the most significant findings regarding the increase in global cloud vulnerabilities and the countries most at risk?
- The number of global cloud vulnerabilities has more than doubled in four years, rising from 1700 to 3900, according to IBM's X-Force research. This increase exposes a significant weakness in global cybersecurity, impacting various cloud platforms and services worldwide. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Albania are identified as the most vulnerable European countries.
- What are the specific cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities identified in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Albania, the UK, and Italy, and how do these risks differ?
- Kloudle's research reveals that Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Albania have the highest cloud cybersecurity risks in Europe, scoring 71%, 69%, and 67% respectively. This vulnerability is further highlighted by the fact that Bosnia and Herzegovina has experienced nearly nine million cloud security breaches in the last two decades. The UK and Italy also rank high in global risk due to high numbers of data breaches.
- What measures are necessary to address the growing threats to global cloud cybersecurity, and how can these measures be implemented effectively in countries with varying levels of preparedness?
- The significant rise in cloud vulnerabilities underscores the urgent need for improved cybersecurity infrastructure and preparedness. The differing levels of preparedness among vulnerable nations (e.g., low in Bosnia and Herzegovina, high in Italy) suggest that investment in cybersecurity education and robust data protection measures is crucial to mitigate future risks. This includes regular security audits, employee training, and advanced encryption technologies.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the narrative around the alarming statistics of cloud vulnerabilities and high-risk countries, creating a sense of urgency and potential threat. The headline and introduction emphasize the vulnerability of the Balkans, potentially influencing the reader's perception of the problem's geographic focus.
Language Bias
While the article uses factual data, the choice of words like "vulnerable," "threatened," and "belly" creates a somewhat negative and alarming tone. More neutral alternatives could be used, such as "high risk," "challenges," or "areas needing improvement.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on specific countries' vulnerabilities but omits a broader discussion of global cybersecurity threats and the efforts being made by other nations to address these issues. It also doesn't mention the types of vulnerabilities found or the specific cloud platforms affected, which limits the reader's ability to understand the scope of the problem.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by highlighting the vulnerabilities of specific countries without acknowledging the complex interplay of factors contributing to global cybersecurity risks. It implies a simple solution (increased cybersecurity preparedness), without addressing the multifaceted nature of the problem.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a significant increase in global cloud vulnerabilities, impacting the reliability and security of digital infrastructure. This undermines progress towards building resilient infrastructure, a key aspect of SDG 9. The focus on the vulnerability of Balkan countries further emphasizes the uneven distribution of cybersecurity capabilities, hindering inclusive and sustainable industrialization.