euronews.com
Global Conflict Surge: 25% Rise in Political Violence, 223,000 Deaths in 2024
Global political violence surged 25% in 2024, with 223,000 deaths; Palestine is the most conflict-ridden country, experiencing over 50,000 fatalities in the past year and 81% of its population exposed to conflict; the UN projects 305 million people will need humanitarian aid in 2025.
- How do the specific cases of Palestine and Ukraine exemplify the broader trend of increasing global conflict intensity?
- The rise in global conflict intensity is evidenced by a 37% increase in conflict-related deaths in the year leading up to June 2024 compared to the previous year. Palestine, deemed the world's most conflict-ridden country by ACLED, exemplifies this trend with 81% of its population exposed to conflict and over 50,000 fatalities in the past year.
- What is the extent of the global surge in political violence in 2024, and what are its immediate human and societal consequences?
- Global political violence surged 25% in 2024 compared to 2023, resulting in 223,000 deaths and impacting one in eight people. This increase builds on a doubling of global conflicts over the past five years, indicating a severe worsening of global instability.
- What are the projected humanitarian needs and challenges in 2025 arising from the escalating global conflicts, and what systemic issues hinder effective aid delivery?
- The escalating conflicts in Palestine, Ukraine, and other regions highlighted in ACLED's 2025 Conflict Watchlist, including Mexico, Colombia, Pakistan, and Sudan, signal a growing humanitarian crisis. The UN projects 305 million people will need aid in 2025, with underfunding of humanitarian efforts in key conflict zones expected despite international legal obligations.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the increase in global conflict as a significant and alarming trend, emphasizing the rising death tolls and the number of people affected. The use of statistics like "one in eight people exposed to conflict" and "223,000 people killed" creates a sense of urgency and crisis. The headline, if included, would likely reinforce this framing. The focus on the death tolls and the designation of Palestine as the "most conflict-ridden country" emphasizes the negative and destructive aspects of these conflicts.
Language Bias
The language used in the article is generally neutral and factual, relying primarily on statistics and quotes from organizations like ACLED and the UN. However, phrases like "most conflict-ridden country" and "crisis areas" could be interpreted as slightly loaded, implying a subjective judgment. More neutral alternatives could include phrases such as "country with the highest concentration of conflict" and "areas of high conflict risk".
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the number of deaths and conflict incidents, but lacks detailed information on the root causes of these conflicts. While it mentions the war in Ukraine and the conflict in Palestine, it doesn't delve into the political, economic, or social factors driving these conflicts. It also doesn't explore the perspectives of various actors involved or the potential long-term consequences of these conflicts. The omission of this crucial contextual information limits the reader's ability to fully grasp the complexities of these issues.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic view of the global conflict landscape, focusing primarily on the most violent and deadly conflicts while potentially neglecting smaller-scale conflicts or other forms of political violence. It doesn't fully explore the spectrum of conflict intensities or the diverse range of actors involved. For example, while mentioning the humanitarian needs, it does not fully examine the spectrum of international interventions and their effectiveness.
Gender Bias
The article doesn't appear to exhibit overt gender bias. The analysis primarily focuses on the statistical data regarding conflict and casualties, without significant reference to gender-specific impacts or experiences. However, it would be beneficial to include an analysis of how gender-based violence, which is often prevalent in conflict zones, is impacted by these events.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a significant surge in global conflicts in 2024, resulting in a substantial increase in casualties and displacement. This directly undermines the SDG 16, which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels. The escalating conflicts disrupt social order, hinder access to justice, and weaken institutional capacity, thereby impeding progress towards SDG 16.