elpais.com
Global Conflicts Driven by Weakening Institutions and Resurgence of Great Power Politics
Comfort Ero, CEO of International Crisis Group, highlights the weakening of international institutions and the return of great power politics as key drivers behind the current global conflicts, emphasizing Europe's need to strengthen its defense capabilities.
- What are the primary factors driving the current wave of global conflicts, and what are their immediate consequences?
- The world is experiencing a resurgence of great power politics and weakening of international institutions, leading to multiple conflicts.
- How does the resurgence of great power politics affect the effectiveness of international organizations in conflict resolution?
- This resurgence is characterized by a decline in the influence of Western institutions like the UN and a rise in competing national interests, particularly from China. This, coupled with the weakening of traditional conflict-resolution mechanisms, creates a volatile global landscape.
- What are the long-term implications of the shifting global order, specifically for Europe and the Middle East, and what proactive steps are needed to mitigate potential risks?
- Europe's insufficient defense capabilities leave it vulnerable in this changing order. The US is shifting focus towards Asia, necessitating a significant strengthening of European defense systems to maintain regional stability. Continued instability in the Middle East and Africa will exacerbate these challenges.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing centers heavily around Comfort Ero's perspective and analysis, potentially overshadowing alternative interpretations of the geopolitical events. The article uses strong quotes from Ero, such as 'turbo-alimentar su paraguas de defensa', which frames Europe's security situation in a dramatic and urgent light. While her expertise is valuable, presenting this as the singular dominant perspective could lead to a skewed understanding of the issues.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, though phrases such as 'impressive wave of conflicts' and 'severely' could be considered somewhat loaded. These terms carry emotional weight and could be replaced with more neutral alternatives, such as 'significant number of conflicts' and 'substantially'. The use of the word 'turbo-alimentar' while accurate in meaning introduces a sense of urgency that may or may not reflect a universally held view.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the perspectives of Comfort Ero and largely omits other significant voices or analyses regarding the conflicts discussed. While acknowledging the limitations of space, the lack of diverse viewpoints, particularly from those directly affected by the conflicts in regions like Sudan and the Palestinian territories, constitutes a bias by omission. For example, the article mentions the Sudan conflict briefly, describing it as a 'silent war' with little attention despite immense human suffering. Including perspectives from Sudanese citizens, aid workers, and international organizations working in Sudan would significantly enrich the article and provide a more balanced view.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the geopolitical landscape, occasionally framing situations as eitheor scenarios. For instance, the discussion of the US's role presents a dichotomy between the current administration and the Trump administration's approach, without fully exploring the nuances of continuities and changes in foreign policy. Similarly, the discussion of potential solutions in Ukraine presents a somewhat false choice between NATO membership and unspecified security guarantees, without delving into the complexities of alternative security arrangements or the range of possible outcomes.
Gender Bias
The article does not exhibit overt gender bias. The subject is a woman in a position of power, and her expertise is presented without explicit gendered language or assumptions. However, a more comprehensive analysis would benefit from explicitly mentioning the lack of gender-based analysis in these conflicts, which can often play a significant role.
Sustainable Development Goals
The interview discusses the weakening of international institutions and the return of power politics, hindering conflict resolution and global peace. The conflict in Ukraine, the fragility of the Middle East peace process, and the ongoing conflict in Sudan are highlighted as examples of this trend. The lack of international attention on the Sudan conflict further exemplifies the failure of institutions to adequately address global crises.