Global Drying Trend Disproportionately Impacts Asia and Africa

Global Drying Trend Disproportionately Impacts Asia and Africa

allafrica.com

Global Drying Trend Disproportionately Impacts Asia and Africa

A new UN report reveals that over three-quarters of Earth's land has become permanently drier in the last 30 years due to human-caused climate change, disproportionately impacting 2 billion people in Asia and Africa, highlighting the need for increased climate action and accountability from major polluters.

English
Nigeria
Human Rights ViolationsClimate ChangeGlobal SouthDesertificationEnvironmental JusticeClimate MigrationDrylands
UnccdUnccd Science-Policy Interface (Spi)International Organization For Migration (Iom)Oxfam InternationalEuropean Union (Eu)
Nichole BargerNafkote Dabi
How do the findings connect human activities to the expansion of drylands, and what specific examples illustrate this connection?
Human activities, such as greenhouse gas emissions from various sectors, are the main drivers of this global drying trend. This trend is expanding drylands, threatening ecosystems and societies. South Sudan, Tanzania, and China are significantly impacted, experiencing large-scale land transitions to drylands.
What are the primary causes and immediate consequences of the escalating global drying trend, and which regions are most severely affected?
Over the past three decades, more than three-quarters of the Earth's land has experienced permanent drying, with Asia and Africa's drylands disproportionately affected, impacting 1.35 billion and 620 million people respectively. This is primarily due to human-caused climate change, increasing aridity and leading to desertification.
What are the long-term implications of insufficient climate action on the global population, considering the financial commitments and lack of accountability from major polluting nations?
The projected increase in drylands by the end of the century could displace up to 5 billion people, exacerbating existing issues such as soil depletion, water scarcity, and ecosystem collapse. The current insufficient climate finance agreements, described as a "global Ponzi scheme", highlight the lack of accountability from major polluters, who continue to prioritize economic gain over environmental protection, leading to further displacement and suffering.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The article's framing emphasizes the catastrophic consequences of desertification, particularly for vulnerable populations in the Global South. The headline and introductory paragraphs immediately highlight the severity of the issue and the disproportionate impact on these regions. While this effectively conveys urgency, it could inadvertently overshadow the global nature of the problem and the contributions of all nations to climate change. The inclusion of quotes from Oxfam International further reinforces this framing by focusing on the perceived inadequacy of climate finance commitments from wealthy nations.

3/5

Language Bias

The article uses strong, emotive language to describe the situation, such as "existential crisis," "human-perpetrated crime," and "global Ponzi scheme." These terms are not inherently biased but contribute to a highly critical and alarmist tone. While the urgency is understandable, more neutral alternatives could be used in some instances to provide a more balanced presentation. For example, instead of "global Ponzi scheme", a more neutral term might be "critically insufficient funding mechanism".

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the impact of desertification on developing nations, particularly in Africa and Asia. While acknowledging the impact on Western powers, it lacks specific data or examples of the extent of aridity's effects in developed countries. This omission could leave readers with an incomplete understanding of the global scope of the problem and the disproportionate impact on different regions. The article also omits discussion of potential solutions beyond criticizing the lack of financial commitments from wealthy nations.

4/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a stark dichotomy between the wealthy polluting nations and the impoverished nations suffering the consequences of desertification. This simplifies a complex issue by neglecting the nuances of responsibility and the varying levels of contribution to climate change among different groups within developed and developing nations. The portrayal of a simple "polluters vs. polluted" narrative overlooks internal inequalities and complexities within both categories.

Sustainable Development Goals

Climate Action Very Negative
Direct Relevance

The article highlights the expanding drylands due to climate change, impacting billions and causing displacement, hunger, and economic decline. The failure of COP29 to provide adequate funding and the continued pollution by wealthy nations exacerbate the issue, directly hindering progress on climate action.