mk.ru
Global Economy Shifts from Globalization to Fragmentation
The global economy is shifting from globalization to fragmentation, driven by the rise of China, protectionism, and geopolitical tensions, leading to the formation of competing economic blocs centered around the US and China.
- What are the primary factors contributing to the ongoing fragmentation of the global economy, and what are the immediate consequences?
- The global economy, once characterized by increasing interconnectedness and free trade, is now fragmenting into distinct economic blocs. This shift is driven by rising protectionism, geopolitical tensions, and the waning support for a US-dominated liberal economic model. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) identifies this as a move away from globalization toward a multipolar world.
- How did the rise of China as a global economic power impact the trajectory of globalization and the dominance of the US-led liberal economic model?
- The IMF pinpoints the period since 2008 as a turning point, marked by slowing globalization and increased economic nationalism. This is partly due to the rise of China as an economic competitor to the US, challenging the latter's long-held role as the global economic hegemon. The resulting trade wars and sanctions have accelerated fragmentation.
- What are the potential long-term implications of the global economic fragmentation for international trade, geopolitical stability, and the development of emerging economies?
- Looking ahead, the global economy is likely to be structured around several competing economic blocs, potentially including a US-led bloc (G7, EU), a China-led bloc (BRICS, SCO, ASEAN), and a group of non-aligned nations. This fragmentation could lead to reduced global trade and increased regional economic competition, reshaping global supply chains and power dynamics.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames the shift from globalization to fragmentation primarily as a consequence of US actions and policies, particularly those of the Trump administration. While acknowledging China's rise as a significant factor, the analysis centers more on the US's role as the initiator of disruptions. This framing might overlook the contributions of other actors and factors. The use of terms like "golden age" and "historical dead end" to describe periods of globalization reveals a value judgment embedded in the structure of the narrative itself.
Language Bias
The language used reflects a critical stance toward US economic policies and the concept of globalization as it was previously implemented. Words and phrases such as "historical dead end," "economic and political blackmail," and "attempts to restrain" carry negative connotations, implicitly favoring an alternative economic model. More neutral alternatives could include describing the events as "economic challenges," "policy adjustments," or "competitive pressures.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on the US and China's roles in globalization, potentially omitting the perspectives and experiences of other nations significantly impacted by these economic shifts. The role of developing nations in shaping or reacting to globalization is underrepresented. The analysis also downplays the internal political and economic factors within countries that have contributed to the current state of fragmentation.
False Dichotomy
The text presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between globalization (free trade) and fragmentation (protectionism). It overlooks the complexities and nuances of economic systems and international relations. The narrative implies that either the US-led model or a China-led model will prevail, neglecting the possibility of alternative economic arrangements or a more decentralized system.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights how globalization, initially perceived as promoting a unified global market, has instead led to a fragmented economic system where benefits are not equally distributed. The actions of the US and its allies, such as sanctions and trade barriers, disproportionately impact developing nations, exacerbating existing inequalities. The shift towards economic blocs further entrenches these disparities, hindering opportunities for less powerful nations to participate equally in global trade and investment.