repubblica.it
Global EV Growth Slows Amidst Price Drops, Italy Lags Behind
Jato Dynamics' study reveals slowing global EV growth in 2024, despite price drops in Europe, China, and the US; while Italian EV prices are 25% higher than ICE vehicles, the gap will narrow in 2025 with new affordable models, but remain significantly higher compared to China.
- What are the key global trends in electric vehicle sales and pricing, and what are their immediate consequences?
- Global electric vehicle (EV) growth slowed in 2024, despite significant price drops in Europe, China, and the US. In Italy, EVs cost 25% more than traditional vehicles, but this gap is expected to shrink with new models under €30,000.
- What are the potential future impacts of increased EV affordability on the Italian automotive market and broader European trends?
- The Italian EV market, currently at 4% market share, lags behind the European average due to limited offerings in segments A and B. However, numerous affordable EVs (€<30,000) are launching in 2025, potentially boosting market share. Despite Western progress, Italian EV prices remain 126% higher than in China, highlighting significant regional disparities.
- How do price differences between electric and traditional vehicles vary across major markets, and what factors explain these disparities?
- From 2019 to 2023, EV sales surged from 1.4 million to 7.4 million units, but only increased by 1.2 million in the following year. Chinese manufacturers account for 51% of global EV production, while American and European brands hold 22% and 18%, respectively. The average EV price has fallen significantly worldwide, contrasting with rising prices for internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles; in the Eurozone, EV prices dropped 15% between 2018 and 2024, while ICE vehicle prices increased by 7%.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introduction emphasize the slowdown in EV growth, potentially downplaying the significant progress made in the sector. While acknowledging price reductions, the overall framing emphasizes the challenges rather than the overall positive trajectory of EV adoption. The focus on price differences between Italy and China may also be selectively highlighting specific data points to create a certain narrative.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, presenting data objectively. However, terms like "only" when describing the increase in EV sales (1.2 million units) could be considered subtly loaded, potentially downplaying this significant growth. Similarly, describing the Italian EV market's growth as "blocked" may carry a negative connotation. More neutral phrasing would strengthen objectivity. For example, instead of "only" use "an additional." Instead of "blocked", use "slow growth".
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on pricing and market trends of electric vehicles, potentially omitting crucial information regarding the environmental impact, government policies and incentives influencing EV adoption, and technological advancements in battery technology and charging infrastructure. A broader perspective incorporating these factors would provide a more complete understanding of the slowdown in EV growth.
False Dichotomy
The analysis implicitly presents a dichotomy between electric and traditional vehicles, without adequately exploring the potential for hybrid or other alternative fuel technologies. This oversimplification overlooks the complexities of the automotive market and the potential for multiple solutions to transportation challenges.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a decrease in the average price of electric vehicles in Europe, the US, and China, making them more affordable and accessible. This contributes to increased adoption of clean energy transportation, aligning with SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) which aims to ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all.