lemonde.fr
Global Executions Surge to Near Decade High
Amnesty International's 2024 report reveals a global surge in executions, reaching a near-decade high of 1,518 (excluding China), primarily driven by Iran (972), Saudi Arabia (345), and Iraq (63), with drug-related offenses accounting for over 40% of cases.
- What are the most significant global implications of the sharp rise in reported executions in 2024?
- Global executions reached a near-decade high in 2024, with Iran, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia showing significant increases. Amnesty International's report counted 1,518 executions, excluding China's likely thousands, marking a 32% rise from 2023 and the highest since 2015.
- How are Iran, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia contributing to the increased global execution numbers, and what are the underlying causes?
- Iran, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia accounted for 91% of the reported executions, highlighting a concerning trend of state-sanctioned killings. Iran alone executed at least 972, while Saudi Arabia doubled its executions to at least 345, and Iraq saw a near fourfold increase to at least 63. These increases are largely attributed to the use of capital punishment to silence dissent and political opposition.
- What are the long-term consequences of the widespread use of the death penalty for drug-related offenses, and what steps can be taken to address this?
- The rising number of executions in Iran, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia, particularly targeting political opponents and protesters, reveals a worrying disregard for human rights. The use of the death penalty for drug-related offenses, illegal under international law, further underscores a systemic abuse of power. The continued secrecy surrounding executions in countries like China highlights the urgent need for increased transparency and accountability.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The report frames the increase in executions as a serious human rights concern, highlighting the role of Iran, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia. The headline and introduction emphasize the rise in executions and Amnesty International's condemnation. This framing, while potentially alarming, is consistent with Amnesty International's mandate and accurately reflects the data presented. However, a more balanced perspective might include a discussion of the reasons given by these countries for their use of the death penalty.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, employing factual reporting and direct quotes from Amnesty International. Terms like "muzzle dissent" are used to describe government actions, but these are descriptive and accurate within the context of Amnesty International's accusations.
Bias by Omission
The report omits execution numbers for China, North Korea, and Vietnam due to insufficient data. While acknowledging this limitation, the report emphasizes that the known increase is still significant and highlights the countries where data is available. The omission, while understandable given data constraints, could lead to an underestimation of the global total and might not fully reflect the global picture of capital punishment.
Sustainable Development Goals
The increase in executions worldwide, particularly in Iran, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia, signifies a setback for SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels. The use of death penalty against protestors and political opponents undermines justice and rule of law, creating an environment of fear and repression, counteracting the goal of peaceful and inclusive societies.