elmundo.es
Global Patent Race: US Leads, China Surges, Spain Improves
In 2024, the European Patent Office received 199,264 patent applications, with the US leading (24%), followed by China (10%), highlighting global competition for technological dominance in key sectors; Spain showed a 44% growth since 2015.
- How did the introduction of the unitary patent in 2023 affect the number and origin of patent applications to the EPO?
- China's patent applications increased by 250% between 2015 and 2024, reaching 20,081. This surge reflects China's growing technological prowess and ambition in key sectors like energy, AI, and digital media. The introduction of the unitary patent in 2023 has stimulated activity, particularly for US companies viewing Europe as a unified market.
- What are the key global trends revealed by the 2024 European patent application data, and what are their immediate implications for the European economy?
- In 2024, the European Patent Office (EPO) received 199,264 patent applications, with over half originating from outside Europe. The US, Japan, China, and South Korea accounted for over 51% of applications, highlighting the global competition for technological dominance.
- What are the long-term implications of the observed trends for European technological competitiveness and industrial development, particularly for countries like Spain?
- Spain, while still lagging behind major European economies, showed a 44% growth in patent applications since 2015, reaching 2,192 in 2024. This growth indicates increasing industrialization and innovation, particularly in regions with established industrial traditions like Catalonia, which led with 724 applications.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the patent race as a competition for dominance, emphasizing the role of major corporations and nations in securing control over critical sectors. This framing might unintentionally downplay the contributions of smaller companies, individual inventors, and research institutions. The headline (if one existed) would likely reinforce this focus on major players. The use of terms such as 'battlefield' and 'appetite' contributes to the competitive and aggressive tone of the narrative.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, but some terms contribute to a sense of competition and high stakes. Words like 'battlefield', 'dominate', and 'appetite' create a dramatic tone. More neutral alternatives could include terms like 'competitive landscape', 'lead', or 'investment'. The repeated use of 'giants' also reinforces a narrative of large corporations driving innovation.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the number of patents filed and the countries/companies involved, but omits discussion of the specific types of inventions being patented. This omission limits the reader's ability to understand the innovation landscape and the potential implications of these patents. While the article mentions key sectors like energy and medicine, it lacks detail on the specific technological advancements being protected. Additionally, the impact of the unitary patent on SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) is not discussed, which would provide a more complete perspective.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the competition for patents, suggesting a straightforward battle for dominance between a few key players. It doesn't fully explore the complexities of collaborations, licensing agreements, and open-source innovations that also shape the technological landscape. The framing of 'control' as the primary motivation of patent seekers oversimplifies the diverse goals of companies and researchers.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a significant increase in patent applications across various sectors, including energy, artificial intelligence, digital media, medicine, and transportation. This surge in innovation and technological development directly contributes to advancements in infrastructure and industrial processes, thereby supporting the goal of building resilient infrastructure, promoting inclusive and sustainable industrialization, and fostering innovation.