repubblica.it
Global Risks Report 2025: Environmental Threats Dominate Long-Term Outlook
The World Economic Forum's 2025 Global Risks Report, based on the assessment of 900 experts, ranks environmental risks, particularly extreme weather and resource scarcity, as the most significant long-term threats to global stability, while armed conflicts are considered the most pressing immediate concern.
- What are the most significant long-term global risks identified in the World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report 2025, and what are their immediate implications?
- The World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report 2025 highlights environmental risks as the most significant long-term threats, with extreme weather events, biodiversity loss, and resource scarcity topping the list. This is based on the opinions of 900 experts, policymakers, and business leaders. Immediate concerns include armed conflicts, but environmental risks overshadow all others in the longer term.
- How do the identified environmental risks interconnect with geopolitical and social challenges, and what are the potential consequences of this interconnectedness?
- The report reveals a gloomy outlook for the next decade, with nearly two-thirds of respondents anticipating global turbulence by 2035 due to intensifying environmental, technological, and social challenges. Environmental risks, particularly climate change, are seen as interconnected with geopolitical instability and social inequalities, creating a complex web of threats.
- What are the key systemic vulnerabilities highlighted in the report, and what strategies are necessary to mitigate the potential risks and build global resilience?
- The report underscores the urgent need for global cooperation and resilience. Failure to address these interconnected risks, especially climate change and geopolitical tensions, will likely lead to increased instability and exacerbate existing inequalities, demanding proactive strategies for mitigation and adaptation. The growing impact of misinformation and AI also adds complexity to the situation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames climate change as a central and overwhelming threat, consistently highlighted throughout. Headlines and introductory paragraphs emphasize the findings of the Global Risks Report, which prioritizes environmental risks. This framing might disproportionately influence readers to perceive environmental risks as more significant than other global challenges.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and factual, reporting the findings of the World Economic Forum's report. However, phrases like "rather dark" in describing the report's outlook could be considered slightly loaded, implying a subjective interpretation. The repeated emphasis on the severity of climate change risks might also subtly influence the reader's perception.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on environmental risks, particularly climate change, as identified by the World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report. While geopolitical risks are mentioned, the analysis of these risks is less detailed compared to the environmental risks. Other societal and technological risks are mentioned but not deeply explored. This omission might lead to an unbalanced perception of global risks, potentially downplaying the importance of non-environmental factors.
False Dichotomy
The article doesn't present a false dichotomy in a strict sense, but it emphasizes the environmental risks more prominently than others. The framing might unintentionally create an impression that climate change is the most pressing issue above all others, neglecting the complexity of interconnected global challenges.
Sustainable Development Goals
The report highlights climate change as a major global risk, impacting ecosystems, resources, and human health. Extreme weather events are identified as a primary concern, and the 1.5-degree Celsius warming threshold has been surpassed. This negatively impacts progress toward climate action goals.