zeit.de
Global Tourism Rebounds to Pre-Pandemic Levels in 2024
Global tourism in 2024 reached pre-pandemic levels with 1.47 billion international arrivals; France led with 102 million, followed by Spain (93.8 million) and the US (72.4 million); Germany reached 37.5 million arrivals.
- What is the global impact of tourism's return to pre-pandemic levels in 2024, considering specific arrival numbers for key countries?
- Global tourism rebounded to pre-pandemic levels in 2024, reaching approximately 1.47 billion international arrivals. France retained its top spot with 102 million arrivals, followed by Spain with 93.8 million. The United States recorded 72.4 million arrivals, while Germany saw 37.5 million.
- What factors contributed to the success of certain countries like France and Spain while others like the US saw a decrease compared to 2019?
- The recovery demonstrates a strong resurgence in global travel despite concerns like flight shaming. France's continued dominance highlights its enduring appeal, while Spain's strong showing reflects its robust tourism infrastructure. The rise of Saudi Arabia (29.7 million arrivals) indicates a shift in popular destinations.
- What potential risks and uncertainties could affect future tourism trends, considering the absence of data from some countries and potential disruptions?
- While the numbers show recovery, the impact of potential future events like stricter US immigration policies or anti-tourism protests in popular locations remains uncertain. The lack of official data from major players such as China and the UK hinders complete analysis. Further monitoring of these factors is needed to accurately predict long-term trends.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a generally balanced overview of global tourism trends, although the countdown-style presentation from 20th to 1st place could be seen as prioritizing the ranking over a more nuanced analysis of individual countries' tourism sectors. The emphasis on the return to pre-pandemic levels and the lack of impact of "Flugscham" (flight shaming) could also be considered a framing bias, potentially downplaying environmental concerns. However, given the overall scope of the article and the factual nature of much of the content, this bias is relatively minor.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and descriptive. However, phrases like "Billigreiseland" (cheap travel destination) in relation to Japan could be considered slightly loaded, implying a negative connotation associated with lower prices. Similarly, the description of the US immigration policy under Trump as "not exactly welcoming" is subjective and could be replaced with a more neutral phrasing such as "restrictive".
Bias by Omission
The article omits data from China and the UK, stating that official figures for 2024 are unavailable. This omission is acknowledged, but the use of estimated rankings for these countries might still slightly skew the overall perception of the top destinations.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a surge in global tourism, reaching pre-pandemic levels. This increase in international travel contributes to overtourism in popular destinations, straining resources and negatively impacting the environment. The rise in air travel, despite awareness campaigns like "Flugscham" (flight shame), further exacerbates this negative impact on sustainable consumption and production.