sueddeutsche.de
Gold Investment: Price Surge and Recommended Purchase Options
Gold's price increased by 38 percent to €2,870 per ounce; "Stiftung Warentest Finanzen" suggests allocating up to 10 percent of savings to gold for portfolio diversification, recommending specific online retailers (Anlagegold24, Auragentum, ESG-Edelmetall-Service, Solit-Gruppe) for physical gold and Trade Republic/Tradegate Direct for gold ETCs.
- What is the current market price of gold, and how can its inclusion in a diversified investment portfolio mitigate financial risk?
- The price of gold has risen by approximately 38 percent in the past year, reaching roughly €2,870 per troy ounce. "Stiftung Warentest Finanzen" recommends including gold in a diversified investment portfolio, up to 10 percent, to offset fluctuations in stocks and bonds due to their often inversely correlated price movements.
- Where can investors purchase physical gold and gold ETCs most affordably, and what are the associated costs and considerations for each?
- Online retailers like Anlagegold24, Auragentum, ESG-Edelmetall-Service, and the Solit-Gruppe offer the most cost-effective physical gold, with markups ranging from zero to eight percent above the market price. Larger units generally have lower markups, with bars being cheaper than coins. Shipping costs around €6.90 apply for delivery.
- What are the key advantages and disadvantages of investing in physical gold versus gold ETCs, and what factors should investors consider when choosing between them?
- Gold Exchange Traded Commodities (ETCs) offer a readily tradable alternative, eliminating physical storage concerns. Trade Republic and Tradegate Direct are highlighted as particularly cost-effective brokers for these ETCs, offering free custody and order execution (excluding trading platform fees and external expenses). However, Tradegate Direct mandates a minimum purchase of €100 worth of Gold-ETCs.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames gold investment positively by highlighting its price increase and potential for diversification. The headline, while neutral, sets a tone of suggesting gold as a viable investment option. The focus on cost-effectiveness in acquiring gold further reinforces this positive framing, potentially downplaying the inherent risks involved.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral. Terms such as "günstig" (inexpensive) and "am günstigsten" (most inexpensive) could be perceived as slightly positive framing, but do not represent severe bias. There is no clearly loaded language present.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the most affordable ways to purchase gold, neglecting discussion of potential risks associated with gold investment such as inflation hedging or its sensitivity to interest rate changes. It also omits any mention of ethical sourcing of gold, a significant consideration for environmentally and socially conscious investors. While acknowledging space constraints is valid, these omissions limit the reader's ability to make a fully informed decision.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by implying that the only two viable options for gold investment are physical gold and gold ETCs. It ignores other investment vehicles such as gold mining stocks or gold-backed mutual funds, thereby narrowing the reader's investment choices.
Gender Bias
The article uses gender-neutral language throughout, referring to "Anlegerinnen und Anleger." However, the choice to use the phrase "Anlegerinnen und Anleger" could still be viewed as slightly awkward and possibly repetitive. There is no evidence of gender bias in terms of sourcing or representation.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses investment strategies to mitigate risks associated with stock and bond market fluctuations. By suggesting gold as a diversification tool (up to 10% of savings), it indirectly promotes financial inclusion and reduces inequality by making investment options more accessible to a wider range of individuals. This strategy can help mitigate losses for those with limited financial resources, thus reducing wealth disparities.