lemonde.fr
Graphic Novel "Ressources" Details Unsustainable Resource Extraction and Promotes Techno-Discernment
Philippe Bihouix and Vincent Perriot's "Ressources. Un défi pour l'humanité" details the unsustainable rate of resource extraction, criticizing technosolutionism and advocating for "techno-discernment" to achieve a sustainable future, highlighting that more resources will be extracted in the next 30 years than in all of human history.
- How does the graphic novel critique the technosolutionist approach, and what alternative solutions are proposed?
- The graphic novel critiques the technosolutionist approach of Silicon Valley giants who see space expansion as a solution to resource depletion. It also examines the limits of technological solutions such as nuclear fusion and artificial intelligence in addressing ecological crises. The authors argue that the dematerialization of the economy has reduced our understanding of resource consumption.
- What are the long-term implications of our current consumption patterns, and how can techno-discernment contribute to a sustainable future?
- Bihouix proposes "techno-discernment," advocating for a deeper understanding of our needs and identifying areas where we can reduce consumption. This approach, inspired by Jacques Ellul, suggests a sustainable future that is not solely reliant on technological advancements but also considers social and environmental impacts. The book encourages a critical analysis of economic growth and its reliance on finite resources.
- What are the immediate consequences of the current unsustainable rate of resource extraction, and how do these impacts affect global systems?
- Philippe Bihouix and Vincent Perriot's graphic novel, "Ressources. Un défi pour l'humanité," uses a dialogue format to explain complex concepts related to resource depletion. The authors highlight the unsustainable rate of resource extraction, emphasizing that we will extract more resources in the next 30 years than since the dawn of humanity. This will lead to increased pollution, deforestation, and toxic waste.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The review frames the book very positively, highlighting its accessibility, clarity, and intellectual richness. While this is largely justified, the overwhelmingly positive tone might overshadow potential shortcomings or limitations of the book's arguments.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and descriptive. Terms like "acerbe critique" are used, but accurately reflect the content discussed.
Bias by Omission
The review focuses heavily on the book's content and message, but omits discussion of the graphic novel's artistic style, visual storytelling techniques, and the collaboration between the author and illustrator. This omission limits a full understanding of the work's overall impact and effectiveness.
False Dichotomy
The review presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the "prométhéenne" vision of infinite growth and the proposed solution of "techno-discernement." It could benefit from acknowledging more nuanced approaches to technological advancement and sustainable development.