kathimerini.gr
Greece's Abolition of the Death Penalty: A Gradual Process
From its presence in the 1823 "Anthology of Crimes," the death penalty in Greece faced gradual abolition through reduced applications, de facto cessation post-1975, and formal removal in 1993, finally ratified with the 13th Protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights in 2004.
- How did the Greek government's response to the 1975 coup attempt affect the legislative process regarding capital punishment?
- The evolution of the death penalty in Greece reflects broader international trends toward abolition. Internal debates, influenced by Enlightenment thought and evolving penal codes, coincided with decreased application. The 1975 Constitution maintained the death penalty but its practical use ceased.
- What were the key factors influencing the gradual abolition of the death penalty in Greece, and what were its immediate societal consequences?
- The death penalty, present in Greek law since the 1823 "Anthology of Crimes," was gradually challenged throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, leading to reduced application and a de facto abolition after 1975. Despite legal ambiguity, no executions occurred post-1972, culminating in its formal abolition in 1993.
- What are the long-term implications of Greece's final abolition of the death penalty, considering its historical context and international legal frameworks?
- Greece's eventual complete abolition of the death penalty in 2004, following the ratification of the 13th Protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights, demonstrates a commitment to international human rights standards. This contrasts with the earlier reluctance to abolish it completely, influenced by political events and the lack of strong legal prohibitions until the late 20th century.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a largely neutral and objective account of the historical evolution of capital punishment in Greece. While it traces the legal and political developments, it does not overtly promote or oppose the death penalty. The chronological structure, focusing on the legal and political shifts, frames the narrative as one of progressive change, reflecting a slow but steady movement towards abolition.
Bias by Omission
The article provides a comprehensive historical overview of capital punishment in Greece, but could benefit from including perspectives from abolitionist movements or organizations throughout the different periods discussed. While the article mentions some opposition to the death penalty, a more detailed analysis of these counterarguments and their impact would enrich the narrative.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article chronicles the gradual abolition of the death penalty in Greece, reflecting a strengthening of the justice system aligned with international human rights standards. The shift away from capital punishment signifies a move towards a more humane and just legal framework, emphasizing rehabilitation over retribution. The process, though protracted, demonstrates the evolution of legal and societal values towards upholding human rights.