
kathimerini.gr
Greece's Low Productivity: A Multifaceted Challenge
Greece faces a productivity crisis, marked by a 12% decline despite increased working hours, stemming from underinvestment, wage compression, and a lack of economic restructuring, resulting in low-value-added production and hindering wage increases.
- What are the most significant factors contributing to Greece's low productivity?
- Greece's low productivity is attributed to chronic underinvestment, wage stagnation, and the absence of a strategic shift in its economic production model. This has resulted in a 12% productivity decline despite a rise in working hours to 41, compared to the EU average of 38.6 hours. The gross value added also decreased by 11% between 2009 and 2024.
- What policy interventions are necessary to boost productivity and support wage increases in Greece?
- Boosting productivity requires combined government interventions focusing on technology, innovation, and human capital. Investments in AI, robotics, digitalization (ERP & CRM), reskilling/upskilling, and fostering collaboration between research institutions and universities are crucial. Streamlining processes (lean management) and improving workforce utilization are also vital for increasing efficiency and reducing costs.
- How does the structure of Greece's economy and its supply chains contribute to the issue of inflation?
- The lack of efficient supply chain management and potential anti-competitive practices inflate prices. A thorough examination of the entire supply chain, from farm to shelf, including margins and adherence to procedures, is needed to identify and address bottlenecks, particularly among essential goods.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced analysis of factors contributing to Greece's low productivity and high inflation, avoiding overt bias in its framing. While it focuses on structural solutions over quick fixes, this is presented as a reasoned argument rather than a biased perspective. The emphasis on supply chain analysis and investment in technology feels objective rather than advocating for a specific policy.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective, employing technical economic terms without loaded language. The author's opinion is clearly presented as such and distinct from factual information. There is no evidence of inflammatory language or emotionally charged words.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on economic factors and omits potential social or political factors influencing productivity and inflation. While this focus is understandable given the author's expertise, a broader perspective incorporating these omitted factors would enhance the analysis. The potential impact of specific government policies is also understated.
Sustainable Development Goals
Addressing low wages and improving productivity can contribute to poverty reduction by increasing income and improving living standards. The article discusses strategies to enhance productivity, which indirectly supports poverty reduction.