liberation.fr
Greenpeace Protests Shell's Role in Climate Change with Large-Scale Art Installation
On August 13th, 2024, seven Greenpeace UK activists protested Shell's role in climate change by creating a large-scale art installation, "BUTCHERED," on the Skiff offshore platform, 80km from Norfolk, using 1000 liters of a red liquid on a 12m x 8m canvas.
- How does the artistic nature of the protest influence its effectiveness and public reception compared to other forms of climate activism?
- Greenpeace's action directly links the visual impact of the art installation to the devastating effects of climate change, including heatwaves, wildfires, and floods, worsened by fossil fuel industries. Shell's response cites safety concerns and illegal trespassing, while Greenpeace emphasizes holding fossil fuel companies accountable for their environmental impact. The contrast underscores the tension between activism and industry.
- What immediate actions are being taken by environmental groups to hold fossil fuel companies accountable for their contribution to climate change-related disasters?
- Seven Greenpeace UK activists scaled Shell's Skiff offshore platform, 80km off Norfolk, on August 13th, 2024, creating a large-scale art installation, "BUTCHERED", to protest Shell's contribution to climate change. The installation involved a 12m x 8m canvas sprayed with 1000 liters of a red liquid, symbolizing the environmental damage caused by fossil fuels. This act of protest highlights the devastating impact of climate change events currently affecting the UK and globally.
- What long-term systemic changes are needed to prevent future environmental disasters linked to the fossil fuel industry, and what role will climate activism play in achieving those changes?
- This protest foreshadows increased climate activism targeting fossil fuel companies and highlights the growing pressure for accountability for the environmental damage caused by the industry. The visual nature of the protest amplifies its message, potentially influencing public perception and policy debates surrounding climate change and fossil fuel use. The choice of Anish Kapoor further elevates the artistic and symbolic significance of the event.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introduction emphasize the dramatic visual of the protest, potentially drawing more attention to the spectacle than the underlying climate change message. The inclusion of Anish Kapoor's statement further emphasizes the artistic aspect, potentially overshadowing the political and environmental dimensions.
Language Bias
Words like "dévastatrices" (devastating) and "massacré" (butchered) are emotionally charged and contribute to a negative portrayal of Shell. The use of "géants pétroliers" (oil giants) also casts Shell in a villainous light. More neutral alternatives could include 'severe' instead of 'devastating,' and 'damaged' instead of 'butchered.'
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Greenpeace's action and Shell's response, but omits discussion of alternative perspectives on climate change action or Shell's broader sustainability efforts. It also doesn't delve into the long-term environmental impact of the protest itself (e.g., the disposal of the dye).
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between Shell (representing the fossil fuel industry) and Greenpeace (representing environmental activism). It doesn't fully explore the complexities of energy transition or the potential for collaboration between industry and environmental groups.
Sustainable Development Goals
The Greenpeace action directly highlights the devastating effects of fossil fuels on the climate, urging accountability from oil giants. The article mentions heatwaves, wildfires, and floods linked to fossil fuels, aligning with climate action goals to mitigate climate change and its impacts. The art installation serves as a powerful visual representation of the climate crisis.