dw.com
Guinean Referendum: High Turnout Amidst Internet Shutdown and Boycott
In Guinea's September 21st referendum, high voter turnout was observed in some areas like Lambangnyi, despite a significant internet shutdown and a boycott by some citizens who deemed the process a "masquerade.
- How did the internet shutdown impact the referendum, and what were the responses to it?
- The internet and social media shutdown negatively impacted media work and citizens' daily lives. Mamadou Lamine Diallo of the National Transitional Council criticized the shutdown, highlighting the need for a constitutional order and legal action against those responsible.
- What was the voter turnout in Lambangnyi, and what were the initial reactions from voters?
- In Lambangnyi, 2,947 registered voters were distributed across six polling stations, with significant morning turnout. Voters reported voting for the referendum, mentioning a slight delay but ultimately positive experiences. One polling station reported 330 votes cast out of 437 registered voters.
- What broader implications does the combination of high voter turnout in some areas, the internet shutdown, and the boycott suggest about the referendum?
- The contrasting scenes of high turnout alongside a significant boycott and internet restrictions suggest divisions within Guinean society regarding the referendum's legitimacy and the government's methods. The internet shutdown raises concerns about transparency and freedom of expression.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view by including both positive and negative aspects of the referendum. While it highlights the participation of some voters and the relatively smooth process in certain voting centers, it also acknowledges the boycott by some citizens and the problematic internet shutdown. However, the inclusion of the election official's statement at the end might be interpreted as giving undue weight to the official narrative.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, reporting events without overt bias. However, phrases like "taches noires" (black spots) and descriptions of the internet shutdown as "inacceptable" introduce a slight negative connotation. The use of quotes from citizens directly reflects their opinions without editorial interpretation.
Bias by Omission
The article lacks information on the overall voter turnout and the final results of the referendum. While it provides specific examples from a few polling stations, it does not present a broader picture of the national results. The article also omits any counterarguments to the criticisms leveled against the internet shutdown.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view by contrasting the enthusiastic voters with those who boycotted the referendum. It overlooks the possibility of a range of opinions and motivations beyond these two extremes. The focus on two contrasting viewpoints simplifies a complex political event.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights irregularities and controversies surrounding the referendum, including internet restrictions, which impede democratic processes and freedom of expression. This negatively impacts the goal of strong institutions and justice. The boycott by some citizens further indicates a lack of faith in the existing institutions.