dw.com
Haiti's Gang Crisis: Underfunded Multinational Force Fails to Curb Violence
In Port-au-Prince, Haiti, over 100 armed gangs control 85% of the city, forcing over 40,000 to flee since mid-February; a Kenyan-led multinational force, despite UN authorization, struggles due to underfunding and has not improved the situation, raising concerns about 2025 elections.
- What is the impact of underfunded and underequipped multinational force deployed in Haiti to combat gang violence?
- Over 100 armed gangs control at least 85% of Port-au-Prince, forcing over 40,000 to flee since mid-February. A Kenyan-led multinational force, deployed in June to combat gangs, has had limited impact due to insufficient funding and equipment.
- How has political corruption in Haiti contributed to the current crisis, specifically regarding gang influence on elections?
- The underfunded and underequipped multinational force, while authorized by the UN, hasn't stemmed gang violence; this is exacerbated by political corruption where gangs have historically influenced elections, receiving funds from politicians in exchange for violence or electoral support.
- What are the long-term implications of the current security situation on Haiti's political stability and humanitarian crisis, considering the potential for a UN peacekeeping mission?
- The ongoing insecurity renders elections in 2025 highly improbable, mirroring past experiences. The high salaries of Kenyan police compared to Haitian officers worsen economic inequality and potentially fuel the humanitarian crisis.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the situation in Haiti as a crisis largely defined by gang violence and political corruption, emphasizing the insecurity and the failures of past and present interventions. While this is a significant part of the story, other contributing factors such as socioeconomic inequalities, historical grievances, and the impact of natural disasters are mentioned but not thoroughly explored. The use of quotes from individuals expressing frustration and despair reinforces the negative framing.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, although words like "crisis," "violence," and "insecurity" frequently appear, setting a tone of alarm and urgency. The description of gang leader Jimmy "Barbecue" Chérizier's actions as potentially aiming to "support a candidate through violence" is a loaded phrase that implies a certain level of threat. A more neutral phrasing could focus on the leader's actions and their potential impact on elections without making such a strong implication.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the perspectives of a barber, a former gang leader, and a human rights lawyer, potentially overlooking the views of other key stakeholders such as government officials, international organizations beyond the UN, or ordinary citizens outside Port-au-Prince. The lack of detailed information on the Kenyan peacekeeping force's operational strategies and challenges beyond financial constraints could also be considered an omission.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the need for international intervention and the potential negative consequences. It highlights the challenges of the current mission but doesn't fully explore alternative approaches to stabilizing Haiti beyond the UN peacekeeping option or the current MSS. The portrayal of gang leaders as solely motivated by political ambition or financial gain might oversimplify their complex motivations.
Gender Bias
The article primarily features male voices (Eddy Jean, former gang leader Jean Claude Joseph) and one female voice (Rosy Auguste Ducéna). While this might reflect the roles of these individuals in the conflict, it could be improved by including the perspectives of more women affected by gang violence or political corruption. There is no overt gender stereotyping in the language used.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the significant challenges to peace and justice in Haiti due to the widespread control of armed gangs, the lack of effective law enforcement, and the resulting humanitarian crisis. The failure of the multinational force to curb gang violence and the ongoing political instability directly hinder progress towards SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions). The quote, "More than 100 armed gangs control at least 85% of the capital, Port-au-Prince," exemplifies the severity of the situation and its impact on peace and security.