welt.de
Hamburg Launches Scientific Inquiry into 2001 NSU Murder
A research team in Hamburg has begun a scientific investigation into the 2001 NSU murder of Süleyman Taşköprü, a greengrocer, to understand systemic failures in the initial investigation and prevent similar acts of right-wing terrorism.
- What specific failures in the initial police investigation of Süleyman Taşköprü's murder allowed the NSU's involvement to go undetected for nearly 24 years?
- Almost 24 years after the murder of Süleyman Taşköprü, a Hamburg greengrocer, a research team has begun a scientific investigation into the killing, attributed to the National Socialist Underground (NSU). The investigation will examine the events and investigations surrounding the murder to produce an independent, comprehensive report. This aims to prevent similar right-wing violence and NSU terrorism in Hamburg.
- What specific recommendations can emerge from this scientific investigation to improve police procedures and inter-agency cooperation to prevent future right-wing extremist violence in Germany?
- This investigation is unique because Hamburg is the only German state where an NSU murder occurred without a parliamentary inquiry. The three-year investigation will leverage existing knowledge from federal and state investigations and the NSU criminal proceedings, focusing on the systemic failures that allowed the murder to occur and remain unsolved for so long. The final report will offer crucial insights into preventing future right-wing extremist attacks.
- How did the organizational, social, and cultural dynamics within German police, state security, and judicial systems contribute to the delayed recognition of the NSU's responsibility for the Hamburg murder?
- The scientific investigation will analyze police investigations and the criminal proceedings related to the NSU murder in Hamburg, considering the broader context of the NSU murders nationwide. The team will examine why police investigations in five states focused on a false hypothesis, considering organizational, social, and cultural dynamics within the police, state security, and judicial systems.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the positive aspects of the scientific review, highlighting the expertise of the team and the thoroughness of the investigation. The potential limitations or challenges of this approach are not given equal weight.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. However, phrases like "NSU-Terror" could be considered emotionally charged.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the recent decision to conduct a scientific review of the case, but omits discussion of potential political motivations behind the delay in addressing this issue. It also doesn't mention any potential criticism of the chosen research team or their methodology.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a clear dichotomy between a parliamentary investigation and the current scientific review, without exploring potential alternative methods of investigation.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the scientific investigation into the murder of Süleyman Taşköprü by the NSU, a neo-Nazi terrorist group. This investigation aims to understand failures in the initial police investigation and prevent similar acts of right-wing terrorism in the future. The focus on accountability and prevention aligns directly with SDG 16, which promotes peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provides access to justice for all and builds effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.