allafrica.com
Harare Council Loses Revenue to Employee Theft
Harare City Council is losing foreign currency revenue because tellers are pocketing US dollar payments and swiping equivalent amounts in local currency using their own bank cards, exploiting the difference between official and black market exchange rates; the council has operated without a billing system since March 2019.
- How does the absence of a billing system since 2019 contribute to the reported revenue losses?
- This revenue loss stems from a combination of internal theft and the absence of a functional billing system since March 2019. The lack of a system allows for easy manipulation of transactions and a lack of transparency, enabling officials to profit from the discrepancy between official and black market exchange rates. The practice is widespread, involving both low and high-level employees.
- What systemic changes are needed to prevent the ongoing loss of foreign currency revenue at Harare City Council?
- The continued loss of revenue severely impacts the council's financial stability and ability to provide services. Without a functioning billing system and stronger internal controls, this practice will likely persist, potentially worsening the city's financial situation. Implementing a robust ERP system and strengthening accountability mechanisms are crucial to curb this.
- What is the immediate financial impact on Harare City Council resulting from its employees pocketing US dollar payments?
- Harare City Council is losing significant foreign currency revenue due to tellers pocketing US dollar payments and swiping equivalent amounts in Zimbabwean dollars using their own cards. This involves collusion with money changers, exploiting the difference between interbank and black market exchange rates. For example, a US$10 payment results in a ZWL110 loss for the council.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames the issue as a scandal involving corrupt officials, emphasizing the illegal activities and financial losses. The headline, while not explicitly stated, would likely emphasize the theft and corruption angle. This framing could shape public perception towards anger and distrust of the council, potentially overshadowing other aspects of the issue.
Language Bias
The article uses strong, emotionally charged language such as "pocketing," "cahoots," "looting," and "scandal." These terms contribute to a negative portrayal of the council officials and amplify the sense of wrongdoing. More neutral terms like "misappropriation," "collaboration," and "irregularities" could be used.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the financial losses and illegal activities, but omits discussion of potential consequences for those involved beyond disciplinary action. It also doesn't explore the potential impact on service delivery to residents due to lost revenue. There's no mention of any investigations beyond the reporter's own inquiries.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by focusing solely on the illegal activities of council employees and the lack of a billing system as the cause of revenue loss. It doesn't consider other potential factors, such as economic conditions or systemic issues within the council's financial management.
Gender Bias
The article mentions a woman who offered to swipe for the reporter and a city official who requested anonymity for fear of victimisation, but doesn't provide information on gender balance within the broader context of those involved in the corrupt activities. More detail is needed to assess gender bias.
Sustainable Development Goals
The corruption within the Harare City Council disproportionately affects low-income residents who may be less able to navigate the complexities of the system or challenge unfair practices. The loss of revenue due to the theft of US dollar payments directly harms the ability of the council to provide essential services to the most vulnerable populations, exacerbating existing inequalities.