dailymail.co.uk
Hatshepsut Statue Destruction: Material Reuse, Not Malice, Suggests New Study
A University of Toronto study suggests that many statues of ancient Egyptian pharaoh Hatshepsut were destroyed not out of malice, but to reuse their materials; this challenges the traditional view of her successor Thutmose III's actions.
- What was the primary cause of the extensive damage to Hatshepsut's statues, and what does this reveal about the prevailing attitudes towards her after her death?
- A new study suggests that the destruction of Hatshepsut's statues in ancient Egypt was primarily due to the reuse of materials rather than animosity towards her. Many statues were broken down methodically at weak points and repurposed as building materials, a practice called 'deactivation'. This challenges the long-held belief that her successor, Thutmose III, orchestrated their destruction out of spite.
- How did the methodology of the statue destruction contribute to our understanding of the motives behind it, and what insights does this provide into ancient Egyptian cultural practices?
- The research, published in Antiquity, examined excavation records from the 1920s. Analysis indicates that damage to Hatshepsut's statues wasn't random, but consistent with ritual deactivation. This suggests that the destruction wasn't solely motivated by hostility towards Hatshepsut, but also by practical and ritualistic reasons.
- What are the broader implications of this research for our understanding of power transitions and legacy management in ancient Egypt, and how might this challenge long-held interpretations of historical narratives?
- This nuanced perspective on the destruction of Hatshepsut's statues may lead to a reevaluation of Thutmose III's actions and a broader understanding of ancient Egyptian funerary practices and power dynamics. While a campaign of persecution against Hatshepsut likely occurred, the extent of its malice might be less than previously assumed. This finding opens avenues for further research into similar instances of statuary destruction.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames Hatshepsut's story primarily through the lens of the destruction of her statues and the subsequent re-evaluation of Thutmose III's actions. While this is an important aspect, the emphasis on this narrative might overshadow her significant achievements and contributions as a pharaoh. The headline and opening paragraphs focus on the 'overlooked' nature of Hatshepsut and the new interpretation of statue destruction, potentially steering the reader to a specific conclusion before presenting a full picture of her reign.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, however, phrases like 'early pioneer of girl power' and 'powerful woman in a man's world' carry a subtly celebratory tone that, while not overtly biased, might influence reader interpretation. The article also uses terms like 'erased or reassigned', which subtly evokes a sense of injustice.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the destruction of Hatshepsut's statues and the potential reasons behind it, but omits discussion of other aspects of her reign, such as the specific policies enacted or the social impact of her rule. While the article mentions her successful reign and building projects, a deeper analysis of her accomplishments beyond the scope of statuary would provide a more complete picture. The article also lacks discussion of other perspectives beyond those presented by Dr. Wong and Kara Cooney.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by portraying the destruction of Hatshepsut's statues as either an act of malicious destruction driven by animosity or a purely ritualistic deactivation. It oversimplifies the potential motivations, ignoring the possibility of a combination of factors or other underlying political agendas.
Gender Bias
While the article celebrates Hatshepsut's achievements as a female pharaoh, it does so through the lens of 'girl power' and her unusual status as a female king. The focus on her gender as an exception to the norm, rather than simply her accomplishments as a ruler, could perpetuate gender stereotypes. The repeated emphasis on her adopting male attire and title also implicitly positions her success within a framework of masculinity.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights Hatshepsut's remarkable achievement as the first female pharaoh of Egypt, challenging traditional gender roles and demonstrating a woman's capacity for effective leadership. Her success in ruling for over two decades showcases the potential for women in positions of power, promoting gender equality. The destruction of her statues, initially perceived as an act of misogyny, is now argued to be primarily due to material reuse, lessening the impact of the negative portrayal of her legacy.