lexpress.fr
Hayat Tahrir al-Sham Seizes Aleppo, Reshaping Syrian Power Balance
Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, a Turkish-backed al-Qaeda affiliate, launched a major offensive on Aleppo, seizing control from Assad's forces and dramatically shifting Syria's power dynamic after years of relative stability following a 2017 agreement among Russia, Turkey, and Iran.
- What are the immediate consequences of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham's offensive on Aleppo, and how does it impact the existing power balance in Syria?
- A former student rushes toward Aleppo University, crying, "This is where the regime tortured me." Since Assad regained control in 2016, he, like thousands of Syrians, lived in refugee camps. His return, however, is not due to a democratic movement but to Islamist militias, notably Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a Turkish-backed al-Qaeda affiliate. This shift in control highlights a recurring pattern since 2011, with the current attack significantly altering Syria's map after years of relative stability.
- How did the involvement of foreign powers, particularly Turkey and Assad's allies, shape the Syrian conflict's trajectory, leading to the current situation?
- The conflict's roots lie in the 2011 uprising, where jihadists infiltrated peaceful protests, supported by Qatar and Turkey. These groups aimed to impose Sharia law, creating a stalemate between them and Assad's regime. Assad used this to portray himself as the main barrier against terrorists, ignoring calls for the rule of law, and even released jihadist prisoners who later led Islamist brigades.
- What are the long-term implications of this renewed conflict for regional stability, including the potential for future conflicts and the humanitarian consequences for the Syrian people?
- Turkey's recent actions exploit Russia's preoccupation with Ukraine, weakening Assad's allies. Aleppo's strategic location—connecting northern Syria to Turkey—makes its control crucial for Turkey to influence trade and military routes, potentially shaping future regional power dynamics and refugee flows before the next US administration.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames Turkey's actions as a response to a lack of political solution and the need to repatriate refugees, thereby potentially justifying or minimizing the consequences of the military operation. The headline (if any) would likely strongly influence this framing. The focus on the strategic importance of Aleppo for Turkey further emphasizes Turkey's perspective and objectives. The description of the returning student highlights the human cost but it's quickly overshadowed by geopolitical analysis.
Language Bias
The article employs charged language in describing Assad's regime as a "mafia" and referring to Hayat Tahrir al-Sham as al-Qaeda's "branch funded by Turkey." The choice of words like "massive attack" and "invasion" evokes strong emotional responses. More neutral language could include: Instead of "mafia," use "authoritarian regime." Instead of "branch funded by Turkey," use "Turkey-backed group." Instead of "massive attack," use "large-scale military operation." Instead of "invasion," use "military incursion."
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the actions of Turkey and its proxies, and the motivations of Assad and his allies. However, it largely omits the perspectives and experiences of the Syrian Kurdish population, whose displacement and potential future are significantly impacted by these events. The article also lacks in-depth analysis of the humanitarian crisis resulting from the conflict, focusing more on geopolitical strategies. The perspectives of ordinary Syrian citizens caught in the crossfire are underrepresented, aside from one anecdote.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the conflict as a struggle between Assad and Islamist groups backed by Turkey, overlooking the complex interplay of regional and international powers (such as Russia, Iran, and the US). It frames the situation as a choice between Assad and Islamist groups, neglecting the role of other actors and the internal complexities of Syrian society.