foxnews.com
Herbal Supplement 'Feel Free' Sparks Health Concerns, Addiction Reports
Feel Free, a kratom and kava-based supplement sold in U.S. gas stations and retailers, is causing severe health issues, including addiction, skin damage, seizures, and suicidal thoughts, prompting concerns about its unregulated nature and lack of warnings.
- What are the immediate health risks and consequences associated with the use of Feel Free, and how significant is its impact on users' lives?
- Feel Free, a herbal supplement sold across the U.S., is raising concerns due to reported addictive properties and severe health consequences. Users describe symptoms including skin infections, seizures, suicidal thoughts, and intense withdrawal, leading to hospitalizations and substantial financial burdens, with some spending \$3,000 monthly.
- What regulatory measures or consumer safeguards are needed to prevent future incidents related to unregulated herbal supplements like Feel Free?
- The case highlights the dangers of unregulated herbal supplements, especially those combining substances with potentially addictive and harmful properties. Future regulations and stricter warnings are needed to protect consumers from products like Feel Free, which causes severe physical and psychological harm. The unregulated nature of the kratom and kava market creates opportunities for exploitation, demanding increased oversight.
- What are the specific ingredients in Feel Free that contribute to its reported addictive and harmful effects, and how do these substances interact?
- The product combines kratom and kava, ingredients linked to various adverse effects. Kratom's opioid-like action causes dependence and withdrawal, while kava is associated with liver damage and skin problems. The unregulated nature of the product and the lack of clear warnings exacerbate these risks.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introduction immediately establish a negative tone, framing Feel Free as a dangerous product causing concern. The article predominantly features negative user testimonials and expert warnings, reinforcing this initial negative framing throughout. While user accounts are included, the sequencing and emphasis strongly suggest that Feel Free is inherently harmful. A more balanced approach would have included a summary of the product's stated benefits and countered the negative experiences with more information on how to use it safely.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language that amplifies the negative aspects of Feel Free. Terms like "deadly substance," "highly addictive," "dangerous health effects," and "withdrawal crises" evoke strong negative emotions and contribute to a biased presentation. More neutral alternatives could include phrases like "substance raising concerns," "potential for addiction," "reported health effects," and "challenges during cessation." The repeated use of words like "addiction" and "dangerous" also creates a negative bias. The inclusion of quotes like "last frontier of addiction" further amplifies the negative framing.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on negative user experiences with Feel Free, but omits any mention of positive user experiences or alternative perspectives on the product's effects. While acknowledging user concerns is important, a balanced perspective would include information on the potential benefits claimed by the manufacturer and any supporting evidence. The absence of this information might lead readers to form a biased opinion.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by focusing solely on the potential negative consequences of Feel Free, without adequately exploring the complexities surrounding kratom and kava use. It implies that the only possible outcomes are addiction and negative health effects, neglecting the possibility of responsible use and potential benefits for some individuals. This oversimplification may mislead readers into believing that there are no nuanced considerations.
Gender Bias
The article includes testimonials from both a male (Chris Oflyng) and a female (Jasmine Adeoye) user. While both accounts detail severe negative experiences, the descriptions of their physical symptoms differ slightly. Adeoye's experience focuses more on skin problems described with vivid, almost visceral details ("alligator skin, coming off in flakes"), while Oflyng's skin issues are described more medically ("reptilian-like"). While not explicitly biased, this subtle difference in descriptive language could be perceived as reinforcing societal gender norms relating to how women's bodies are described. More consistent language could improve objectivity.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the severe health consequences associated with Feel Free, including addiction, skin infections, seizures, suicidal ideations, hospitalizations, and intense withdrawal symptoms. These negative health outcomes directly contradict the SDG target of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all at all ages.