lefigaro.fr
Hermès Overtakes LVMH as Paris Stock Exchange's Most Valuable Company
Hermès regained its top spot on the Paris Stock Exchange on Tuesday, boasting a €248.6 billion valuation, surpassing LVMH's €244.4 billion despite LVMH's significantly higher 2024 revenue of €84.7 billion versus Hermès' €15.2 billion, due to LVMH's disappointing first-quarter results and market uncertainties.
- How did the first-quarter performance of both companies contribute to the shift in market valuation?
- Despite LVMH's significantly larger revenue (€84.7 billion vs. Hermès' €15.2 billion in 2024), Hermès' superior performance and resilience in a volatile luxury market led to its higher market valuation. LVMH experienced a 3% year-on-year revenue decrease in the first quarter and a 7.82% stock price drop on Tuesday, while Hermès shows gains.
- What factors caused Hermès to surpass LVMH in market capitalization despite LVMH's substantially higher revenue?
- Hermès reclaimed its position as the most valuable company on the Paris Stock Exchange on Tuesday, surpassing LVMH. This comes less than seven years after Hermès joined the CAC 40 index. Hermès' market capitalization reached €248.6 billion, exceeding LVMH's €244.4 billion valuation.
- What are the long-term implications of these contrasting performances for the future of the luxury goods market and the competitive landscape between Hermès and LVMH?
- LVMH's disappointing first-quarter results and weak Chinese demand, coupled with geopolitical uncertainties and potential US tariffs, contributed to its decreased valuation. Conversely, Hermès' consistent strong performance and record results, including a nearly 1% gain since January 1st, highlight its robust business model and resilience in a challenging economic climate. The contrast in performance reflects differing strategies and market sensitivities.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames Hermès's success as a direct contrast to LVMH's struggles, emphasizing Hermès's record results and LVMH's disappointing performance. The headline (if any) would likely highlight Hermès's achievement, potentially downplaying LVMH's overall size and success. The introduction reinforces this framing by immediately mentioning Hermès's top position.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, though phrases like "Hermès ne connaît pas la crise" (Hermès doesn't know crisis) and descriptions of LVMH's situation as "début difficile" (difficult start) and "pâtit de résultats décevants" (suffers from disappointing results) subtly favor Hermès. More neutral language could be used, for example, instead of "Hermès ne connaît pas la crise", a more neutral alternative would be "Hermès continues to show strong results".
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on the financial performance and market capitalization of Hermès and LVMH, neglecting other crucial aspects such as the social and environmental impacts of both companies. There is no mention of the working conditions, sustainability initiatives, or ethical sourcing practices of either brand, potentially omitting information relevant to a complete understanding of their success.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by portraying Hermès as thriving while LVMH struggles. While it highlights LVMH's challenges, it doesn't fully explore the complexities of the luxury market or acknowledge that even Hermès might face future headwinds. The framing simplifies a complex economic situation.
Sustainable Development Goals
Hermès's record results and strong performance contribute to economic growth and demonstrate success in the luxury goods sector, creating jobs and generating revenue. The article highlights its significant revenue and net income figures, showcasing positive economic impact.