zeit.de
High Cardiovascular Risk Underestimated in Germany
A Robert Koch Institute study reveals that nearly 20% of German adults (35-69) have a high or elevated risk of a first heart attack or stroke within 10 years, but half underestimate their risk, based on data from 3270 telephone interviews conducted between June 2022 and January 2023.
- What specific risk factors and data collection methods were employed in the Robert Koch Institute study on cardiovascular risk in Germany?
- The study, using a points system based on factors like age, sex, diet, smoking, and family history, revealed a significant discrepancy between actual and perceived risk. High risk was defined as >10% probability, elevated risk as 7.5-10%. Key risk factors included hypertension, diabetes, obesity, smoking, and unhealthy diet.
- What is the prevalence of high or elevated cardiovascular risk among German adults aged 35-69, and what is the degree of underestimation of this risk?
- Almost 20% of German adults aged 35-69 face a high or elevated risk of a first heart attack or stroke within the next 10 years, according to a Robert Koch Institute study. Half of those at risk underestimated their own cardiovascular risk. The study used data from approximately 3270 telephone interviews conducted between June 2022 and January 2023.
- How can the significant discrepancy between actual and perceived cardiovascular risk be addressed to improve preventative healthcare strategies in Germany?
- This significant underestimation of cardiovascular risk highlights a critical need for improved public health interventions. The RKI recommends online self-tests to empower individuals to assess and mitigate their risk through lifestyle changes. Addressing this knowledge gap is crucial for reducing Germany's high rates of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the high number of individuals unaware of their risk, potentially leading to alarm, but it also provides recommendations for risk reduction, balancing the potentially negative framing.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and factual, avoiding charged terminology. The use of terms like "hohes Risiko" (high risk) is accurate within the context of the study's definition but could be slightly softened for a broader audience.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the high number of individuals unaware of their risk, but omits discussion of potential socioeconomic factors contributing to unhealthy behaviors or limited access to healthcare, which could influence risk factors.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a clear dichotomy of those aware and unaware of their risk, without exploring the nuances of risk perception or individual variations in understanding medical information.
Gender Bias
The article mentions that studies show men have a higher risk than women, but doesn't delve into the reasons or explore potential gendered biases in healthcare access or risk factor development.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights that nearly 20% of German adults aged 35-69 have a high risk of heart attack or stroke within the next 10 years. This directly impacts SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), specifically target 3.4 which aims to reduce premature mortality from non-communicable diseases. The fact that half of those at risk underestimate their likelihood of developing cardiovascular disease further exacerbates the issue, hindering preventative measures. The article also mentions that diabetes and obesity increase the risk, and these conditions are also addressed within the SDG 3 scope.