
elpais.com
High Seas Treaty Enters into Force
After securing 60 ratifications, the High Seas Treaty, officially the Agreement on Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ), will enter into force on January 17, 2024, enabling the creation of marine reserves in international waters.
- What is the immediate impact of the High Seas Treaty entering into force?
- The treaty allows for the creation of marine reserves in international waters, addressing a major gap in ocean protection. It enters into force 120 days after the 60th ratification, on January 17, 2024. Spain was the first European country to ratify it, with Sri Lanka, San Vicente y las Granadinas, Sierra Leona, and Morocco among the final ratifiers.
- What broader implications does this treaty have for global ocean conservation?
- The treaty provides a legally binding mechanism for designating marine protected areas, a crucial step toward the global goal of protecting 30% of the ocean by 2030. It addresses the lack of environmental controls in international waters, which constitute more than 70% of the planet's oceans.
- What challenges and future steps are anticipated in implementing the High Seas Treaty?
- The first Conference of the Parties (COP) is scheduled for 2026 to establish specific marine reserve proposals and protection rules. Concerns remain regarding potential exploitation of international waters, especially given actions by the US, where Donald Trump has signaled intentions to exploit resources without thorough impact assessments.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a largely positive framing of the High Seas Treaty, highlighting the celebratory reactions from environmental organizations and emphasizing the treaty's potential benefits for marine biodiversity. The headline, while not explicitly stated in the provided text, would likely reflect this positive framing. The inclusion of quotes from environmental advocates further reinforces this positive perspective. However, the article also acknowledges potential challenges, such as the complex ratification process and the opposing stance of Donald Trump, providing a degree of balance. The inclusion of Trump's opposition, however, could be seen as an attempt to heighten the importance of the treaty's success, thereby strengthening the positive framing.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective, employing factual reporting and quotes from various sources. There is a noticeable absence of loaded or emotionally charged language. The use of terms such as "historic moment" and "monumental achievement" while positive, are used within quotes from advocates, not as the overarching tone of the article itself. The article maintains a balanced tone by including both positive and negative aspects of the situation.
Bias by Omission
While the article provides a comprehensive overview of the treaty's adoption, potential omissions might include a deeper analysis of specific challenges in implementing the treaty. The article mentions the complexities of national ratification processes, but doesn't delve into specific obstacles or the potential for resistance from certain countries. Similarly, the article briefly mentions opposition from Donald Trump, but could benefit from a more in-depth exploration of counterarguments or potential hurdles to implementation.
Sustainable Development Goals
The High Seas Treaty, officially known as the Agreement on Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ), is a landmark achievement in international cooperation for marine conservation. The treaty establishes a legal framework for the creation of marine protected areas in international waters, addressing a critical gap in ocean governance. This directly contributes to SDG 14 (Life Below Water), specifically target 14.5, which aims to protect 10% of coastal and marine areas by 2020 and significantly increase this by 2030. The treaty provides a mechanism to significantly expand marine protected areas, thus contributing to the conservation of marine biodiversity and the sustainable use of ocean resources. The treaty's focus on marine protected areas, coupled with its legally binding nature, ensures a robust framework for safeguarding ocean ecosystems.