nrc.nl
Historian's Essay Links Personal Struggle to Rise of Fascism
Jessica van Geel's essay, "A Stone on My Desk," published in early 2025, examines the rise of contemporary fascism through a personal lens, contrasting individual responses to historical parallels, urging small acts of resistance and community engagement against the normalization of extremist ideologies.
- What immediate actions can individuals take to effectively resist the rise of right-wing extremism and fascism, considering the complex moral and practical challenges involved?
- In early 2025, Jessica van Geel, a historian, grapples with the rise of right-wing extremism, mirroring historical fascism. Her essay, "A Stone on My Desk," reflects this internal struggle, contrasting her own cautious approach with her activist wife's more engaged stance. The essay explores the moral complexities of resistance, drawing parallels between current events and World War II.
- How do the personal experiences and internal conflicts of Jessica van Geel illuminate the broader challenges of confronting contemporary forms of fascism and the diverse responses to it?
- Van Geel's essay connects personal experiences with broader historical patterns, examining the characteristics of those who resisted fascism then and now. She contrasts the seemingly ordinary individuals who aided Jews during the Holocaust with the diverse profiles of those drawn to fascist movements. This analysis underscores the importance of individual moral choices in the face of rising authoritarianism.
- What long-term implications and potential future trends can be identified from the historical and contemporary parallels drawn in van Geel's essay, concerning both individual and collective responses to authoritarianism?
- Van Geel's work suggests that effective resistance isn't solely about grand gestures but also small, consistent acts of defiance and mutual support. The essay concludes with her participation in a large-scale protest, highlighting the power of collective action and the importance of maintaining awareness and vigilance against the normalization of extremist ideologies. It emphasizes the significance of individual responsibility and community engagement.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative is framed through the author's personal journey and reflections, which enhances the emotional impact but might inadvertently overshadow a broader analysis of the political and social issues at hand. The emphasis on the author's internal struggles and personal growth, while engaging, might inadvertently minimize the scale and seriousness of the threats posed by right-wing extremism. The use of personal anecdotes, while effective for emotional connection, could also inadvertently lead to a more subjective or less systematic analysis.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, but certain word choices, such as describing right-wing populists as "misogynistic" and "extremist," carry strong negative connotations. While these terms accurately reflect the author's perspective, alternative phrasing like "right-wing" or "populist" could offer a more neutral tone without sacrificing accuracy. The use of terms like "woke-extremists" is loaded with negative connotations and might be considered inflammatory. More balanced, neutral terminology would improve the analysis.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the author's personal experience and reflections, potentially omitting broader societal perspectives on the rise of right-wing populism and fascism. While the inclusion of historical figures like Truus van Lier and academic references provides context, a more comprehensive analysis of the political landscape and the various responses to it might enrich the understanding. The omission of specific policy discussions or analyses of the effectiveness of different forms of resistance could also be considered.
False Dichotomy
The essay presents a somewhat simplified dichotomy between active resistance and apathy, potentially overlooking the nuances of individual agency and the various forms of engagement available to citizens. While the author acknowledges small acts of resistance, the overall narrative implicitly frames significant engagement as participation in large-scale protests, neglecting other forms of activism.
Gender Bias
The article features a female protagonist grappling with political issues and the expectations of gender roles within activism. It highlights potential gendered expectations regarding political engagement. However, it doesn't explicitly discuss wider gender imbalances in political representation or activism, meaning this aspect of the analysis could be expanded upon. The portrayal of the author's wife as more overtly involved in activism, even if presented as a humorous contrast, could inadvertently reinforce certain gender stereotypes. More balanced representation of male engagement with political issues would improve neutrality.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the rise of fascism and the importance of resisting oppression, directly relating to SDG 16 which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels. The author reflects on historical resistance movements and encourages readers to engage in peaceful activism against injustice.