faz.net
Hofmannsthal's "Und es kommt kein Sturm heut Abend": A Sunset Poem
Hugo von Hofmannsthal's poem "Und es kommt kein Sturm heut Abend," written after a pivotal meeting with Stefan George in December 1891, uses impressionistic imagery of a sunset to reflect a personal sense of calm despite inner turmoil, showing the influence of Symbolism.
- How did Hofmannsthal's encounter with Stefan George influence the creation and themes of "Und es kommt kein Sturm heut Abend?
- Hofmannsthal's encounter with Stefan George in December 1891 profoundly impacted his poetic development, leading to a new self-assurance, as evidenced by his later description of the encounter as revealing a "whole new world". This encounter is reflected in the poem's imagery of conflicting sensory impressions, resolving into a sense of calm despite potential inner turmoil.
- What is the central theme of Hofmannsthal's poem "Und es kommt kein Sturm heut Abend," and how does it reflect the poet's personal experience?
- Und es kommt kein Sturm heut Abend" is a poem by Hugo von Hofmannsthal, initially titled "Ebbe" (Ebb), reflecting sensory impressions of a sunset. The poem's structure mirrors its fragmented imagery, using four-line stanzas with loose connections between verses, symbolizing a half-collapsed state.
- In what ways does the poem's artistic style and imagery connect to broader artistic movements of the time, and what is its lasting significance?
- The poem's impressionistic style, evident in its rich use of alliteration and assonance, invites comparison to Monet's "Impression, Soleil Levant." Hofmannsthal's later reflection on his meeting with George highlights his sense of belonging within a broader artistic movement that connected English and Romantic traditions, solidifying his poetic identity.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames Hofmannsthal's encounter with George as a pivotal, transformative event, emphasizing its impact on his poetic development and self-assurance. The selection and sequencing of details prioritize this interpretation, potentially overshadowing other contributing factors to Hofmannsthal's artistic growth.
Language Bias
The language is largely descriptive and analytical, employing literary terminology. However, terms like "Verstörend widerstreitend" (disturbingly contradictory) in the opening could be considered somewhat loaded, as it sets a subjective tone. More neutral alternatives could be used to describe the sensory impressions.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on the relationship between Hofmannsthal and George, potentially neglecting other influences on Hofmannsthal's poetic style or broader socio-cultural context of the time. The piece mentions Impressionism and Monet, but doesn't explore the connections in depth, limiting a full understanding of artistic influences.
False Dichotomy
The text presents a somewhat simplified view of the impact of George on Hofmannsthal, focusing on a 'before' and 'after' narrative of their meeting. The nuances of a complex relationship and evolving artistic development are somewhat overlooked.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the formative encounter between Hugo von Hofmannsthal and Stefan George, highlighting the influence of George on Hofmannsthal's poetic development. This mentorship and the subsequent artistic growth exemplifies the positive impact of quality education and artistic exchange on individual development and cultural enrichment. The focus on artistic development and the exchange of ideas between established and emerging artists also indirectly promotes the value of intellectual growth and cultural heritage.