dw.com
HTS Seizes Most of Aleppo, Raising Fears of Regional Instability
Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a UN-designated terrorist group, has captured most of Aleppo, Syria's second-largest city, prompting a Syrian government retreat and raising concerns about regional stability. HTS forces, allegedly backed by Turkey and Qatar, are advancing towards Hama and Homs, and President Assad's whereabouts remain unknown amid rumors of his escape to Russia.
- What are the immediate consequences of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham's takeover of most of Aleppo?
- Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a jihadist organization listed by the UN as a terrorist group, has seized most of Aleppo, Syria's second-largest city, displacing millions. HTS forces, supported by Qatar and Turkey, are advancing towards Hama and Homs, causing Syrian and Iranian-backed forces to retreat. The International Aleppo Airport, previously controlled by Kurdish YPG forces, is now under HTS control after negotiations.
- What are the underlying causes of the current Syrian crisis, and what role does Turkey play?
- The HTS offensive marks a significant shift in Syria's civil war, potentially destabilizing the region further. The absence of a strong response from Assad, who reportedly fled to Russia, and the withdrawal of Russian forces from Deir ez-Zor suggest a weakening of the Syrian government's control. Turkey's suspected involvement raises questions about its commitment to the Astana peace process.
- What are the potential long-term implications of this conflict for regional stability and international relations?
- The ongoing conflict may trigger a new refugee crisis, impacting neighboring countries and potentially the West. The power vacuum created by Russia's distraction in Ukraine and the weakening of Hezbollah in Lebanon may have emboldened Turkey to pursue its strategic interests in northern Syria, potentially escalating tensions with Russia and Iran. Assad's uncertain future further complicates the already volatile situation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the threat posed by HTS and the vulnerability of Assad's regime, creating a narrative that focuses on the potential collapse of the government. The headline, if one were to be created, might be: "HTS Advances Threaten Assad's Regime", which is a strong bias towards this narrative. The frequent use of "τζιχαντιστές" (jihadists) creates a negative connotation and influences reader perceptions of HTS actions.
Language Bias
The term "τζιχαντιστές" (jihadists) is repeatedly used to describe HTS forces, carrying a strong negative connotation that may not fully reflect the complexities of the group or the situation. More neutral terms like "fighters" or "militants" could be considered.
Bias by Omission
The article omits discussion of potential motivations for HTS actions beyond strategic advantage. It also lacks details on the internal dynamics within the Syrian government and opposition forces. The impact of international actors, beyond the mentioned countries, is not explored.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic eitheor scenario: Assad's regime versus HTS, overlooking the complexities of various factions involved in the Syrian conflict and the potential for multiple outcomes besides those mentioned.