lemonde.fr
Human Rights and Neoliberalism: A Critical Analysis
Sciences Po Press's new book collection, "Penser avec," begins with a critical examination of whether human rights are inherently neoliberal, questioning their efficacy in achieving social justice within the context of rising illiberalism.
- How do the critiques of human rights as neoliberal tools impact their effectiveness in promoting social justice globally?
- Sciences Po Press launched a new book collection, "Penser avec," featuring critical analyses of contemporary issues by humanities researchers. The first book, questioning the neoliberal nature of human rights, argues that their effectiveness in achieving social justice is debated amid rising illiberal trends.
- What historical and philosophical arguments underpin the critique of human rights as obstacles to social justice, and how do these critiques manifest in contemporary political discourse?
- The collection's debut title examines criticisms of human rights, particularly their alleged incompatibility with social justice. Authors trace this critique back to Marx's assertion that human rights prioritize individual self-interest over community, a view echoed by contemporary thinkers who see human rights as a neoliberal construct.
- What are the potential long-term implications of the ongoing debate surrounding the compatibility of human rights with social justice, and what alternative frameworks might be considered?
- This book challenges the increasing dismissal of human rights, particularly within democratic discourse. By exploring historical and philosophical critiques, it aims to re-evaluate the role of human rights in achieving social justice, particularly in the context of growing illiberal movements.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes critiques of human rights, giving more prominence to the arguments against them than to their potential benefits or successes. The headline question, "Les droits de l'homme sont-ils néolibéraux ?", is framed as a potential assertion rather than a neutral inquiry, thereby influencing the reader's initial perception.
Language Bias
While the language is largely academic and factual, the selection of quotes and emphasis on criticisms could be interpreted as having a negative connotation towards human rights. Terms like "disqualifiés" and "vertement critiqués" suggest a strong negative assessment.
Bias by Omission
The provided text focuses on critiques of human rights from a specific intellectual perspective, potentially omitting counterarguments or alternative viewpoints on the relationship between human rights and neoliberalism. The article doesn't explore potential benefits or successes of human rights initiatives, which could lead to a skewed understanding of their overall impact.
False Dichotomy
The text presents a dichotomy between human rights and neoliberalism, suggesting they are mutually exclusive. However, the relationship is likely more nuanced and complex than presented, with potential for integration or co-existence.
Gender Bias
The text does not exhibit overt gender bias in its language or representation of individuals. The authors mentioned, however, are predominantly male.
Sustainable Development Goals
The book tackles critiques of human rights, arguing that they can still be levers for social justice even amidst illiberal trends. Addressing this critique directly contributes to discussions on achieving more equitable societies, a core element of SDG 10.