nbcnews.com
Idaho Police Shoot Disabled Teen Nine Times, Sparking Outrage
Police in Pocatello, Idaho shot a 17-year-old boy, Victor Perez, nine times on Saturday after responding to a 911 call about a disturbance involving a knife; Perez, who has cerebral palsy and limited English proficiency, is now in critical condition after surgeries, including a leg amputation, sparking protests and raising concerns about police use of force.
- How did the pre-existing conditions of the victim and the actions of his family influence the events leading up to the police shooting?
- The incident highlights the complex challenges of police response to individuals experiencing mental health crises, particularly those with physical disabilities. The eyewitness video, showing Perez's limited mobility and family's attempts to de-escalate, raises questions about whether lethal force was necessary. The police chief stated that officers gave repeated commands before firing.
- What specific actions by police led to the shooting of a 17-year-old boy with cerebral palsy, and what were the immediate consequences?
- On Saturday, Pocatello, Idaho police shot a 17-year-old boy, Victor Perez, nine times in his front yard leaving him in critical condition after three surgeries, one of which involved the amputation of his leg. The shooting followed a 911 call reporting a physical disturbance involving a knife. Eyewitness video shows Perez, who has cerebral palsy and limited English, holding a knife while family members attempt to intervene before police arrived and opened fire.
- What systemic issues does this case expose regarding police response to individuals in mental health crisis, and what policy changes might prevent similar tragedies?
- This case underscores the urgent need for improved police training in de-escalation techniques and crisis intervention for individuals with mental health challenges and physical disabilities. The differing accounts—police stating Perez advanced towards them while armed and an eyewitness saying the situation wasn't dangerous—necessitate a thorough investigation. The outcome may influence policy changes on use-of-force procedures and police response to similar incidents.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing emphasizes the police account of the incident, giving significant weight to Chief Schei's statements. While the eyewitness video and family statements are included, they are presented largely as counterpoints to the police narrative. The headline and introductory paragraphs focus heavily on the police response, creating an immediate sense that the shooting is justified. This framing could influence readers to accept the police explanation of events without critical consideration of the alternative perspectives.
Language Bias
The article uses relatively neutral language. However, phrases like "Perez struggles to stand up before he moves toward the police officers," may subtly imply an aggressive intent when considering his physical and cognitive limitations. The descriptions of Perez's actions could be modified to focus on observable behaviors and limit subjective interpretation, for example, instead of "moves toward", it could be written "approaches." Similarly, "armed noncompliant individual" could be altered to "individual holding a knife who did not comply."
Bias by Omission
The article omits information about the training and protocols followed by the Pocatello Police Department in de-escalation tactics and dealing with individuals experiencing mental health crises. It also doesn't include details about the department's policies on the use of force, particularly when dealing with disabled individuals. The lack of this context limits the reader's ability to fully assess whether the officers' actions were justified or if there were alternative responses available. Further, while the police chief mentions the existence of other evidence, it's not presented to the reader for evaluation.
False Dichotomy
The narrative presents a false dichotomy by framing the situation as a simple choice between the officers using lethal force and the immediate, perceived danger posed by Perez. It ignores the complexity of the situation, the possibility of alternative de-escalation techniques, and the potential role of the bystanders in resolving the situation without lethal force. The limitations of Perez's cognitive and physical abilities are mentioned but not fully incorporated into the evaluation of the danger.
Sustainable Development Goals
The shooting of a mentally and physically disabled 17-year-old by police highlights systemic inequalities within the criminal justice system and access to mental healthcare. The incident disproportionately affects vulnerable populations and raises concerns about excessive force and inadequate responses to individuals in crisis.