Illegal Adoption Network Separated Thousands of Babies in France and Belgium

Illegal Adoption Network Separated Thousands of Babies in France and Belgium

lemonde.fr

Illegal Adoption Network Separated Thousands of Babies in France and Belgium

A Belgian man's search for his biological mother in Dunkirk, France, reveals a vast illegal adoption network operating between France and Belgium from 1950 to the late 1980s, involving thousands of babies separated from their mothers and placed with adoptive families in Belgium.

French
France
JusticeHuman Rights ViolationsHuman RightsFranceBelgiumAdoptionBaby TraffickingStolen Children
Œuvre D'adoption
Christophe De NeuvilleThérèse WanteDonatienne Cogels
What specific legal and regulatory failures enabled the illegal adoption operations to flourish for decades?
Between 1950 and the late 1980s, a Belgian adoption agency, led by Thérèse Wante, facilitated the transfer of babies born in northern France to adoptive parents in Belgium. Pregnant women, largely from Flanders and the Netherlands, were sent to French clinics; their newborns were subsequently given to adoptive families, often for a fee, sometimes exchanged if unsuitable.
What is the systemic impact of the illegal adoption network run by Thérèse Wante, and how does it affect those involved?
Christophe de Neuville, 65, returned to Dunkirk, France, on May 7th, seeking information about his biological mother. He is one of 30,000-40,000 babies, possibly more, separated from their mothers and sent to Belgium through a network orchestrated by Thérèse Wante's adoption agency. De Neuville was taken from his mother at three days old.
What are the long-term consequences, both individual and societal, resulting from this network's actions and the lack of legal accountability?
This case highlights a systematic pattern of illegal adoptions, enabled by legal loopholes in both France and Belgium and a lack of oversight. The long-term impact includes the ongoing trauma for those separated from their biological families and a need for accountability regarding those involved in this network. The absence of legal repercussions for Wante during her lifetime raises concerns about complicity and insufficient regulation.

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the events as a 'trafficking' scheme, emphasizing the suffering of the children who were separated from their mothers. The headline is not provided, but the introductory paragraph immediately establishes this perspective and sets the tone for the rest of the piece. The choice to use emotionally charged language like "children volés, vendus, comme des marchandises" ("stolen, sold children, like merchandise") further strengthens this framing. While the article acknowledges Thérèse Wante's religious background, this framing predominates over other possible interpretations of the situation.

4/5

Language Bias

The article utilizes strong and emotionally charged language throughout. Terms like "trafic," "enfants volés," and descriptions of Thérèse Wante as a "vraie teigne" (a real pest) are examples of loaded language that shape the reader's perception of the events. More neutral language, focusing on the facts of the situation without value judgments, would improve the objectivity of the piece. For instance, "children separated from their mothers" could replace "stolen children.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the experiences of Christophe de Neuville and a few other individuals, but it doesn't explore the perspectives of the adoptive parents or the broader societal context surrounding adoption practices during that period. The motivations of those involved in the adoption process beyond Thérèse Wante are largely unexplored. The article also lacks information regarding any legal challenges or investigations into the practices of the Œuvre d'adoption beyond the mention of a lack of legal accountability. Omitting these perspectives and details limits the reader's ability to fully understand the complexities of the situation.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The narrative presents a clear dichotomy between the victims (children born under X and their biological mothers) and the perpetrators (Thérèse Wante and those complicit in the scheme). The complexities and nuances of motivations are largely ignored, and there is no discussion of the ethical dilemmas faced by those involved in the adoptions at the time or how the legal system might have influenced the situation. This oversimplification could skew the reader's understanding of the historical context.

2/5

Gender Bias

The article focuses primarily on the experiences of male individuals (Christophe de Neuville) while providing limited details on the experiences of the mothers. The article predominantly refers to the mothers as "young women," which is somewhat vague, and lacks specific detail on how their situations were handled beyond their being sent to the French clinics. More balanced representation of the mothers' perspectives would enhance the article's objectivity. While Thérèse Wante is described as a powerful figure with a strong personality, the description of her behavior doesn't contain any explicit gender bias.

Sustainable Development Goals

No Poverty Negative
Direct Relevance

The trafficking of infants deprived vulnerable mothers of resources and potentially subjected children to neglect or unsuitable adoptive homes, perpetuating cycles of poverty and hardship.