repubblica.it
Illegal Adoptions from Chile to Italy: A Mother's Search
In Chile, Maria Avilla's 4-year-old daughter was illegally adopted, possibly to Italy, highlighting a larger pattern of illegal international adoptions from poor families, involving Italian agencies and the troubled Chilean child welfare agency, SENAME.
- What long-term systemic changes are needed in Chile to prevent future cases of illegal international adoptions and improve the protection of vulnerable children?
- The ongoing investigation into illegal adoptions in Chile, spanning from the Pinochet dictatorship to the present, reveals a systemic issue. The lack of a single entity investigating recent cases hinders data collection and accountability. Maria Avilla's case exemplifies the suffering of countless families and the need for comprehensive reform within the Chilean child welfare system.
- What are the immediate consequences and global significance of the numerous illegal international adoptions of children from Chile, particularly those involving Italy?
- In 2018, Maria Avilla, a 17-year-old Chilean mother, was prevented from seeing her 4-year-old daughter, Alice, at a childcare center. This was the start of a years-long struggle to find her daughter, who was illegally adopted, possibly to Italy. Thousands of similar cases of illegal adoptions from Chile are now under scrutiny.
- How did the involvement of Italian adoption agencies in Chile contribute to the high number of Chilean children adopted by Italian families, and what role did the Chilean government agency SENAME play?
- This case highlights a broader pattern of illegal international adoptions from Chile, disproportionately affecting poor families and involving Italian adoptive families. Over 70% of Chilean children internationally adopted in the last 15 years went to Italy; Italian-run institutions in Chile have faced multiple scandals. The Chilean government agency responsible for minors, SENAME, has been criticized for abuses.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative strongly emphasizes the emotional distress and suffering of the mothers whose children were allegedly taken illegally. The use of phrases like "stolen children" and detailed accounts of the mothers' anguish creates a powerful emotional appeal, potentially influencing the reader to view the situation primarily through the lens of maternal loss. While this perspective is important, a balanced approach would also offer counterpoints to ensure a more complete understanding of the situation.
Language Bias
The article employs emotionally charged language, such as "stolen children," "terrible abuses," and descriptions of the mothers' heartbreak. While the emotional intensity resonates with the gravity of the situation, it also runs the risk of sensationalizing the issue. More neutral language choices, for example, replacing "stolen" with "illegally adopted" could convey the facts more objectively.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the experiences of Maria Avilla and Yohanna Oyarzo, providing detailed accounts of their struggles. However, it lacks broader statistical data on the total number of successful international adoptions from Chile, the demographics of children adopted, and the long-term outcomes for both the children and their adoptive families. While the article mentions the number of adoptions to Italy and other countries, more comprehensive data would strengthen the analysis of the scale and impact of these adoptions. Additionally, the article omits discussion of potential legal frameworks governing international adoptions in Chile and how these laws might have contributed to or prevented the alleged irregularities. The lack of information on the role and oversight of Chilean government agencies beyond the Sename also represents a significant omission.
False Dichotomy
The article doesn't explicitly present a false dichotomy. However, the repeated emphasis on "illegal adoptions" versus the implicit assumption of all other adoptions being legal could subtly create a simplified eitheor narrative. A more nuanced presentation could acknowledge the complexities and range of legal and ethical considerations within international adoptions.
Gender Bias
The article primarily focuses on the experiences of mothers, which is understandable considering their direct involvement. However, the lack of male perspectives, including fathers' or adoptive fathers', could create an imbalance in representation. Further investigation into how the alleged irregularities affected men could provide a fuller picture.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights cases of illegal adoptions in Chile, disproportionately affecting poor families. These actions perpetuate cycles of poverty by separating children from their families and potentially denying them access to resources and support that could alleviate poverty.