elpais.com
In-Work Poverty in Spain: 17.1% of Families with Children Affected
A Save the Children report reveals that 17.1% of Spanish families with children and at least one working parent are in in-work poverty, with higher rates for single-parent (32%) and large families (35.5%), due to factors like part-time work, low wages, and lack of family support, disproportionately affecting single mothers and migrant families.
- What are the main factors contributing to in-work poverty in Spain, as identified by the Save the Children report?
- The Save the Children report highlights that employment in Spain doesn't guarantee basic needs are met. Factors like part-time work, low hourly wages, and lack of family support contribute significantly to this in-work poverty. The poverty threshold for a family with two adults and two children was €2,027 in 2023, while for single-parent families it was €965, compared to the minimum wage of €1,184.
- How do gender and migration status intersect with in-work poverty in Spain, and what are the long-term implications?
- The report emphasizes the disproportionate impact on single mothers and migrant families, who face compounded vulnerabilities. Structural gender inequalities like limited job access, wage gaps, and childcare responsibilities exacerbate the problem. Regional disparities exist, with Andalusia, Castilla-La Mancha, and Murcia showing the highest rates of in-work poverty.
- What percentage of Spanish families with children and at least one working parent live in in-work poverty, and how do these figures vary by family type?
- In Spain, 17.1% of families with children and at least one working parent experience in-work poverty, meaning their income is below the poverty line. This is higher for single-parent (32%) and large families (35.5%). The national average is 11.7%.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing centers on the struggles of women and families, particularly single mothers and migrants. While this highlights a significant issue, the consistent focus on hardship and lack of resources could create a predominantly negative and potentially disempowering narrative. While the statistics provide a broader context, the emotional weight is placed on individual struggles, possibly neglecting systemic solutions.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, focusing on factual reporting. However, phrases like "ahogada" (drowned) and descriptions of feeling "overwhelmed" and "struggling to make ends meet" carry emotional weight that could influence reader perception towards sympathy rather than a balanced analysis of the systemic problem. While these are accurate portrayals of lived experiences, their consistent use might overshadow the structural issues contributing to poverty.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the experiences of three women, offering limited perspectives from men facing similar challenges of work-related poverty. While acknowledging the feminization of poverty, a more balanced representation would include stories of fathers struggling with low wages and insufficient work hours. The absence of diverse viewpoints might unintentionally reinforce stereotypes.
False Dichotomy
The article doesn't explicitly present false dichotomies, but the repeated emphasis on the insufficient nature of work to alleviate poverty could subtly imply a false choice between working and escaping poverty, ignoring the systemic issues of low wages and lack of social support.
Gender Bias
The article heavily emphasizes the experiences of women, especially single mothers and migrants, which reflects the reality of gendered poverty. However, the lack of parallel stories of men experiencing similar economic hardship could perpetuate the stereotype of women as primarily responsible for household finances and childcare. The article mentions the gender pay gap and the disproportionate burden of care on women, but could further explore the societal factors contributing to this imbalance. For example, it could explore policies that support parental leave and affordable childcare which would impact both men and women.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights that 17.1% of Spanish families with children and at least one working parent experience in-work poverty, meaning their income is insufficient to surpass the poverty threshold. This directly contradicts SDG 1 (No Poverty) which aims to end poverty in all its forms everywhere. The report further shows higher rates of in-work poverty among single-parent (32%) and large families (35.5%), emphasizing the disproportionate impact on vulnerable groups. Quotes such as "No llego, no sé como lo hago, pero... poco a poco", and "Vemos que la situación de las familias con hijos empeora. Vemos en el día a día que trabajar no es suficiente" directly illustrate the failure to achieve SDG 1 target.