faz.net
Increased Phone Fees in West Germany, 1964, and the Political Context
In August 1964, West German post minister Richard Stücklen raised phone fees, while rejecting a postal rate hike, prompting concerns about political instrumentalization of communication with East Germany.
- What broader political context informed the concerns surrounding communication with East Germany in 1964?
- The 1964 incident occurred before a 1965 West German federal election. This led to suspicion that the government was using the shared national feeling regarding East Germany for political gain rather than genuine concern for reunification, creating further tensions regarding the divided nation.
- How did the 1964 phone fee increase in West Germany relate to broader political anxieties about relations with East Germany?
- The rejected postal rate hike, deemed crucial for communication with East Germans, fueled concerns that the government prioritized political tactics over genuine East-West relations. A Heidelberg historian expressed worries about the potential for manipulating communication with East Germany, suggesting that the government might not be serious about reunification.
- How did Wolfgang Schieder's later career and scholarship reflect his early concerns about the use of communication as a political tool in divided Germany?
- Schieder's life work demonstrates his sensitivity towards the political manipulation of language and symbolism. His research on Italian fascism and his contributions to lexicons of political language highlight an ongoing concern about how political communication shapes national identity and international relations, reflecting his 1964 concerns about East-West relations.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article indirectly touches upon Reduced Inequality by discussing the political context of post-war Germany and the concerns about the potential for increased social division due to communication barriers. The author's concern about the potential for manipulating "brothers and sisters in the Zone" highlights a concern for equitable access to information and communication, which is a factor in reducing inequalities. However, the main focus of the text is on historical analysis and biography, not directly on the measurement or impact of inequality reduction policies or programs.