azatutyun.am
Increased Risk of Armenian-Azerbaijani War in 2024
Armenian military experts warn of heightened war risks from April 2024 due to reduced constraints on Azerbaijani aggression, lack of peace treaty commitment, and increased Turkish-Azerbaijani military cooperation, including four high-level military visits in three weeks.
- What are the primary factors increasing the risk of war between Armenia and Azerbaijan in 2024?
- Armenia faces increased risks of war from April 2024, as factors deterring Azerbaijani aggression have diminished. The conclusion of the UN Climate Change Conference (COP) and a lack of Azerbaijani commitment to a peace treaty with Armenia raise concerns. Azerbaijan continues to present preconditions, hindering negotiations.
- How have recent political and diplomatic events contributed to the heightened tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan?
- The decreased influence of external actors, coupled with Azerbaijan's opportunistic approach and strengthened military ties with Turkey, increases the likelihood of conflict. Azerbaijan's early 2024 elections removed a potential constraint on military action, suggesting an intention to exploit a favorable geopolitical climate. Increased Turkish-Azerbaijani military contacts, including four high-level visits in three weeks, further amplify this risk.
- What are the potential long-term implications of the increased military cooperation between Turkey and Azerbaijan, and what strategies could mitigate the risks of escalation?
- The potential for renewed conflict hinges on several factors, including the evolving stances of the US and Iran, and the impact of a potential Russo-Iranian strategic agreement. While this agreement could act as a regional stabilizing factor if signed in mid-January 2025, the intensification of Turkish-Azerbaijani military cooperation, mirroring the pattern before the 2020 war, remains a serious cause for concern. The lack of clear commitment from Azerbaijan towards peace negotiations further exacerbates this risk.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing of the article emphasizes the potential for increased Azerbaijani aggression and the risks to Armenia. The headline (if any) and introductory paragraphs likely set this tone, potentially influencing the reader to perceive a greater threat than might be objectively warranted. While concerns are legitimate, the narrative could benefit from a more balanced presentation of the situation.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and factual in reporting the statements of the experts. However, phrases such as "potential for increased Azerbaijani aggression" could be considered slightly loaded, potentially implying a pre-determined intent on Azerbaijan's part. A more neutral alternative might be "increased risk of conflict." The use of the word "threat" repeatedly reinforces a sense of danger.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the perspectives of Armenian military experts and political analysts, potentially omitting viewpoints from Azerbaijani officials or international observers. This omission could limit the reader's understanding of the situation's complexity and the motivations of all parties involved. While acknowledging space constraints, the lack of diverse perspectives could be considered a significant bias.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the potential for war, focusing on the increased risk without fully exploring the range of possible outcomes or the factors that could prevent conflict. While the experts express concerns, the analysis doesn't sufficiently delve into potential de-escalation strategies or countervailing forces.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses increasing risks of war between Armenia and Azerbaijan in 2024. Increased military cooperation between Turkey and Azerbaijan, coupled with Azerbaijan's postponement of elections, raises concerns about regional stability and the potential for conflict, undermining peace and security. The absence of genuine peace negotiations further exacerbates the situation.