lexpress.fr
India Bans Online Gambling, Impacting Billions in Revenue
India's new Online Gaming Act of 2025 prohibits all forms of online gambling, impacting a $23 billion industry and prompting legal challenges.
- How does India's approach to online gambling compare to other countries' regulations?
- Other countries have varying approaches. The UK has implemented online betting limits, while China has a complete ban and a licensing system. The US has legalized online casinos in only seven states, highlighting the global diversity in regulating online gambling. The key difference often lies in the definition of 'gaming' and 'prize'.
- What is the immediate impact of India's new Online Gaming Act on the online gaming industry?
- The act effectively shuts down online gambling in India, threatening $23 billion in combined valuation and $3.6 billion in annual revenue for Indian real-money gaming startups. Companies like Dream11, which generated $769 million in revenue in 2023, face the loss of 95% of their revenue and all profits.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of this ban, considering legal challenges and the rise of offshore platforms?
- While the Supreme Court will review legal challenges, the ban may not eliminate online gambling entirely. It could drive users to unregulated offshore platforms and potentially hinder the growth of India's legitimate gaming industry, with a significant loss of tax revenue (estimated $2.3 billion annually). The unclear definition of gaming in the act may also harm broader creative industries.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view of the Online Gaming Act 2025, acknowledging both the government's rationale for the ban (addressing problem gambling and related suicides) and the concerns of the gaming industry (potential harm to legitimate businesses and the rise of illegal offshore platforms). However, the article's focus on the negative impact on large Indian gaming companies like Dream11, and the inclusion of their financial details and sponsorship deals, might unintentionally give more weight to the industry's perspective than the government's. The headline (if there was one) could also significantly influence framing.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, although terms like "frénésie de jeu en ligne" (online gaming frenzy) could be considered slightly loaded. The description of the government's actions as a "basculement majeur" (major shift) might also subtly suggest a more negative connotation than a simple description of the new legislation. Neutral alternatives could be 'significant change' or 'substantial legislative shift'.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including perspectives from various stakeholders beyond the gaming industry and the government. For example, it omits perspectives from users of online gaming platforms, gambling addiction experts, or representatives from organizations promoting responsible gaming. While space constraints are acknowledged, including a brief summary of these perspectives would enhance the article's overall understanding.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the issue as a simple choice between either banning online gambling or allowing unregulated gambling that leads to problem gambling. It doesn't explore the potential for regulated online gambling as an alternative solution. The fact that other countries have different regulatory approaches is mentioned, but not explored in depth.
Sustainable Development Goals
The Online Gaming Act 2025 aims to address the issue of individuals losing their savings due to online gambling, ultimately contributing to reduced inequality by protecting vulnerable populations from financial exploitation. The act tackles a significant problem that disproportionately affects lower-income individuals, who may be more susceptible to problem gambling and its financial consequences. While the law has economic implications for the gaming industry, its primary focus is on mitigating the social and economic disparities caused by problem gambling.