independent.co.uk
India's Supreme Court Curbs 'Bulldozer Justice'
The Supreme Court of India has condemned the practice of demolishing properties of suspected criminals, issuing strict guidelines to ensure due process and prevent abuse of power.
English
United Kingdom
JusticeHuman Rights ViolationsHuman RightsLawIndiaSupreme Court
Supreme Court Of IndiaCongress PartyBharatiya Janata Party (Bjp)
Narendra ModiVivek TankhaSambit Patra
- What is the practice of "bulldozer justice"?
- The court's decision comes in response to petitions challenging the practice of "bulldozer justice," where authorities demolish homes and businesses of suspected criminals as a form of punishment.
- What are the consequences of violating the Supreme Court's guidelines?
- Violation of these guidelines will result in contempt of court charges and financial penalties for officials involved. The ruling is seen as a landmark decision against the misuse of power by state governments.
- What are the main criticisms and justifications surrounding the demolitions?
- Critics allege that such demolitions disproportionately target religious minorities, particularly Muslims, and are used as a tool of political and religious oppression. The government, however, maintains it only targets illegal structures.
- What action did the Supreme Court of India take regarding the demolition of properties?
- The Supreme Court of India issued strict guidelines against the demolition of properties of suspected criminals, deeming it unconstitutional to deprive innocent people of their shelter without due process.
- What guidelines did the Supreme Court issue to prevent the misuse of demolition powers?
- The guidelines mandate a 15-day notice to the owner or occupier, sent by registered post and displayed on the property, prior to any demolition. The demolition process must also be videographed.