dw.com
Indonesia Launches Joint Program to Boost State Revenue by 2025
Indonesia's Ministry of Finance launched a joint program on March 27th, 2025, involving seven units to boost state revenue by 2025, focusing on enhanced tax collection, customs, and non-tax revenue, and targeting over 2,000 identified taxpayers for increased monitoring and collection.
- What specific actions are being taken to increase Indonesia's state revenue by 2025 under the new joint program?
- On March 27th, Indonesia's Ministry of Finance launched a joint program involving seven internal units to boost state revenue by 2025. This initiative aims to increase tax, customs, and non-tax revenue through enhanced collaboration and oversight.
- What are the potential long-term economic and social consequences of successfully implementing this revenue-boosting initiative?
- The program's success hinges on effective inter-agency cooperation and technological advancements to combat tax evasion and smuggling. Future implications include a more sustainable fiscal foundation for Indonesia, potentially impacting economic growth and public services.
- How does this joint program address President Prabowo Subianto's mandate to raise Indonesia's tax ratio, and what specific targets are being pursued?
- This program, mandated by President Prabowo Subianto, synergizes efforts across various directorates to improve Indonesia's tax ratio. Specific actions include enhanced monitoring of over 2,000 identified taxpayers, optimization of digital transaction taxation, and intensified revenue collection from commodities like coal and palm oil.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the new joint program very positively, highlighting the government's proactive approach and the expected increase in tax revenue. The headline (not provided, but inferred from the description) likely emphasizes the positive aspects. The quotes from Sri Mulyani and Anggito Abimanyu are presented to support this positive framing. The focus is on the government's actions and projected success, potentially neglecting potential obstacles or drawbacks.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, focusing on factual reporting of government actions and statements. Words like "optimalisasi" (optimization), "sinergi" (synergy), and "meningkatkan" (increase) are used positively, but this reflects the government's own framing rather than a biased choice of words by the author. There are no obviously loaded or charged terms used.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the Indonesian government's efforts to increase tax revenue, but omits potential counterarguments or criticisms of these policies. It doesn't mention potential negative impacts on businesses or citizens, or alternative approaches to fiscal policy. While space constraints likely contribute, the lack of diverse perspectives weakens the analysis.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic view of increasing tax revenue as the primary solution to fiscal challenges. It doesn't explore other potential solutions, such as spending cuts or economic diversification, creating a false dichotomy between increased tax revenue and fiscal sustainability.
Gender Bias
The article mentions two key figures, Sri Mulyani Indrawati and Anggito Abimanyu. While both are given prominence, there's no overt gender bias in the reporting itself. However, the lack of other female voices in the piece is noteworthy.
Sustainable Development Goals
By improving tax collection, especially from high-income earners and corporations, and optimizing PNBP from premium services, this program aims to reduce income inequality and promote a more equitable distribution of wealth. Increased government revenue can fund social programs that benefit the most vulnerable populations.