usa.chinadaily.com.cn
Indonesia Leverages China-ASEAN+ Model for Economic Autonomy
The China-ASEAN+ model, a trilateral alliance between China, ASEAN, and the Gulf Cooperation Council, is emerging as a vital counterweight to rising protectionism, with Indonesia leveraging it to secure long-term LNG contracts in rupiah or renminbi, reduce reliance on the dollar, and enhance its geopolitical position.
- What are the immediate economic impacts of the China-ASEAN+ model on Indonesia, and how does it affect the country's geopolitical position?
- The China-ASEAN+ model, a trilateral alliance between China, ASEAN, and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), is emerging as a vital counterweight to rising protectionism and disrupted global value chains. This economic zone, encompassing over 2 billion people and a $25 trillion economy, fosters South-South partnerships facilitating trade and investment. Indonesia, a key player, is leveraging this model to achieve national development goals and diversify geopolitical dependencies.
- How does the China-ASEAN+ model address the challenges of rising protectionism and disrupted global value chains, and what specific examples illustrate its success?
- The China-ASEAN+ model's strength lies in its economic complementarity: China provides advanced manufacturing, ASEAN offers resources and labor, and the GCC contributes capital. This synergy is evident in projects like Indonesia's $6 billion electric vehicle battery complex and increased trade between China and ASEAN, reaching $982 billion in 2024 and an additional $234 billion in Q1 2025. This framework facilitates trade, investment, and innovation through tariff-light corridors, creating a robust economic bloc.
- What are the potential risks and challenges associated with the China-ASEAN+ model for Indonesia, and what proactive steps can Indonesia take to mitigate these risks and maximize its benefits?
- Indonesia's strategic use of the China-ASEAN+ model includes securing long-term LNG contracts in rupiah or renminbi, reducing reliance on the dollar. The country's participation in the CIPS pilot and development of a central bank digital currency further enhance its position within this emerging financial architecture. However, risks remain, including maritime tensions and potential US scrutiny of increased trade, requiring proactive measures like ratifying the China-ASEAN FTA 3.0 and issuing green sukuk.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the "China-ASEAN+" model extremely positively, highlighting its benefits for Indonesia and downplaying potential risks. The headline and introductory paragraphs emphasize the model as a "vital counterweight" and "compelling antidote" to global economic challenges. This positive framing could potentially influence reader perception by emphasizing the model's advantages while minimizing potential downsides. The repeated use of positive language ('compelling', 'vital', etc.) creates a strongly favorable impression.
Language Bias
The article uses predominantly positive and optimistic language when describing the "China-ASEAN+" model. Words like "vital," "compelling," and "synergy" create a strongly positive connotation. While these terms are not inherently biased, their consistent use without counterbalancing negative aspects leads to an unbalanced tone. For example, instead of 'compelling antidote', a more neutral phrase could be 'alternative economic framework'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the benefits of the "China-ASEAN+" model for Indonesia and the region, potentially omitting potential drawbacks or criticisms of the model. While acknowledging some risks (e.g., South China Sea tensions, US trade enforcement), a more balanced perspective including voices critical of the model would strengthen the analysis. The article also doesn't explore potential negative consequences of de-dollarization for Indonesia or the global economy. Omission of these perspectives limits the reader's ability to form a fully informed opinion.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy between the "China-ASEAN+" model and the pre-2018 era of multilateralism, implying a stark choice between the two. It suggests that the current model is a necessary response to the breakdown of the previous system, without fully exploring the potential for reform or alternative multilateral approaches. The framing overlooks complexities and nuances within global economic relations and the possibility of multiple viable pathways.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the positive impact of the "China-ASEAN+" model on economic growth and job creation in Indonesia. The development of Indonesia's $6 billion electric vehicle battery complex, increased trade with China and the Gulf countries, and the involvement of Gulf investors in Indonesian projects all contribute to economic growth and the creation of decent work opportunities. The focus on digital economy development and the integration of Indonesian SMEs into larger markets also create employment opportunities and boost economic activity.