Indonesia Officially Joins BRICS

Indonesia Officially Joins BRICS

dw.com

Indonesia Officially Joins BRICS

On January 6th, 2025, Brazil announced Indonesia's official entry into BRICS, a decision reached by consensus among existing members and reflecting Indonesia's economic size and commitment to global governance reform. Indonesia previously pursued a non-aligned foreign policy.

Ukrainian
Germany
PoliticsInternational RelationsGeopoliticsIndonesiaBricsGlobal SouthExpansion
Brics
Prabowo SubiantoRetno Marsudi
What factors influenced Indonesia's decision to join BRICS, considering its prior non-aligned stance?
Indonesia's accession to BRICS, a group representing 35% of global economic output before Indonesia's addition, reflects a shift in global power dynamics and Indonesia's desire for greater influence in international affairs. This move follows Indonesia's stated intention to join BRICS in October 2024, after a summit in Kazan, Russia.
How might Indonesia's membership in BRICS impact future global economic cooperation and governance reform?
Indonesia's entry into BRICS signals a potential realignment of global economic and political alliances. Its inclusion, alongside other emerging economies, may lead to increased economic cooperation and influence within the BRICS group, potentially reshaping global governance structures. Indonesia's previous non-aligned foreign policy suggests a calculated move to diversify partnerships and increase its global standing.
What is the significance of Indonesia's accession to BRICS for global economic and political power dynamics?
Indonesia officially joined the BRICS group on January 6th, 2025, as announced by the Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This decision, reached by consensus among existing members, adds Indonesia's significant population and economy to the BRICS bloc.

Cognitive Concepts

2/5

Framing Bias

The framing emphasizes the positive aspects of Indonesia joining BRICS, highlighting Indonesia's economic strength and alignment with BRICS goals. The announcement from Brazil, a current chair of BRICS, is prominently featured, lending a positive spin to the news. While this is not inherently biased, the exclusive focus on positive framing limits a nuanced understanding of the implications of Indonesia's decision.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral and factual. While the article expresses enthusiasm regarding Indonesia's membership, this is mostly presented as a factual observation rather than a subjective judgment. However, phrases like "makes a positive contribution" could be considered subtly positive framing, although not overly biased.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the Indonesian perspective and the Brazilian announcement, neglecting potential counterpoints or dissenting opinions from other BRICS members or global actors. While the article mentions Indonesia's stated policy of non-alignment, it lacks a balanced exploration of how this decision might affect relations with other countries, particularly those not in BRICS. The article also does not explore potential downsides or challenges Indonesia might face as a member of BRICS.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat simplified view of Indonesia's foreign policy, suggesting a binary choice between non-alignment and BRICS membership. It does not fully explore the complexities of Indonesia's geopolitical positioning and its potential for maintaining relationships with diverse partners even as a BRICS member. The narrative implies that joining BRICS is a straightforward decision with few potential drawbacks.

Sustainable Development Goals

Reduced Inequality Positive
Direct Relevance

The expansion of BRICS, an organization focused on developing economies, with the inclusion of Indonesia, could potentially lead to a more equitable global economic order by amplifying the voices and interests of developing nations in international forums and decision-making processes. Indonesia's participation might foster economic cooperation and knowledge sharing, potentially reducing economic disparities between member states and promoting more inclusive growth.