dw.com
Indonesia: Violent Protests Erupt After Police Kill Delivery Driver
The death of a delivery driver, Affan Kurniawan, at the hands of Indonesian elite police sparked widespread protests across the country, resulting in at least eight deaths, hundreds injured, over 1240 arrests, and at least 20 missing, according to KontraS.
- What are the underlying socio-economic factors contributing to the widespread unrest?
- Widespread unrest stems from long-standing grievances, including rising economic hardship, a perceived government indifference to citizen problems, and a shrinking middle class. Approximately 60% of Indonesian workers are in the informal sector without social security, and nearly 10 million people experienced downward social mobility in the last five years, according to CELIOS.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of these protests and the government's response?
- The government's militaristic response, including deploying troops and restricting online communication, risks escalating tensions and normalizing state violence against protestors. Unless parliamentary reforms are implemented, as demanded by protestors, the underlying issues fueling unrest are unlikely to be resolved, potentially leading to further instability.
- What immediate impacts resulted from the death of Affan Kurniawan and the subsequent police response?
- The killing of Affan Kurniawan ignited violent protests across Indonesia, leading to at least eight deaths, hundreds of injuries, and over 1240 arrests. The government responded by restricting TikTok's livestream function, a key platform for protest mobilization.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced account of the protests in Indonesia, detailing both the government's response and the protesters' demands. However, the framing of President Prabowo's response as 'restrictive' and the inclusion of criticisms from various experts subtly leans towards a negative portrayal of the government's actions. The headline (if there was one) would significantly influence the framing; a headline focusing on violence might skew the narrative towards highlighting the negative aspects of the protests, while a headline emphasizing the protesters' demands could create a more sympathetic portrayal.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective, employing descriptive terms like "paramilitary police," "massive military deployment," and "restrictive response." However, phrases like "elite paramilitary police" and describing the president's actions as 'restrictive' carry subtle negative connotations. The use of the term "terrorist" in reference to the protesters, attributed to the president, is highly charged and should be presented with more context and analysis.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including more diverse voices beyond the quoted experts and protesters. While it mentions the government's perspective, a more in-depth analysis of the government's justifications for its actions would provide a more comprehensive picture. Additionally, the economic analysis could benefit from specific data sources and more detailed information on the government's economic policies that have contributed to the current situation.
False Dichotomy
The article avoids simplistic eitheor framings. It acknowledges the complexity of the situation, presenting the protesters' grievances alongside the government's response. The complexities of Indonesian politics and socio-economic factors are fairly well represented, avoiding oversimplification.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a significant income inequality in Indonesia, where 60% of the workforce lacks stable income and social security, while the middle class shrinks, pushing millions into poverty. The disproportionate increase in parliamentarians' salaries compared to the average citizen's income further exacerbates this inequality, fueling public outrage and protests. The government's response, including suppressing dissent and prioritizing the police and military, further intensifies the negative impact on efforts to reduce inequality.